Solicitor misled own relatives about their conveyancing fees

Fees: Solicitor misled clients

A conveyancing solicitor who misled clients he was related on how their fees would be calculated has been fined by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Atholl McGregor Taylor also failed to make proper disclosure to a lender client of a trust deed affecting the property.

According to an SRA notice, Mr Taylor, who at the time worked for Rotherham firm Parker Rhodes Hickmotts, acted for relatives Mr and Mrs M in a conveyancing transaction in August 2018.

He told them by email that the firm levied fees of 0.25% on residential sales over £1m and that his fee would therefore be £3,000.

But he went to say that he had discussed the costs with his managing partner, who agreed to reduce them to £2,000.

In fact, the firm did not have such a policy and there was no such discussion.

The solicitor told the SRA that the fees policy was his own and that he had apologised to the managing partner. He admitted that this was a breach of his duty to act with integrity.

Separately, Mr Taylor acted for Mr and Mrs T on a transfer of land to their daughter and her husband, Mr and Mrs D.

He drafted a trust deed which stipulated that, if Mr and Mrs D did not build a property on the land within seven years, it would revert back to Mr and Mrs T. Further, if they did build and sell a property in that time, Mr and Mrs T would receive a share of the proceeds.

Mr Taylor then acted for Mr and Mrs D, and Newcastle Building Society, in relation to their mortgage application, but did not disclose the trust deed to the lender.

He admitted to the SRA that he had failed to act in his lender client’s best interests. In mitigation, he said he had believed that he did not need to disclose the deed as it was a family arrangement which, in his view, would not affect the security.

In further mitigation, Mr Taylor said he had “difficult personal and medical circumstances” around the time of the misconduct, his conduct was not deliberate, he had shown “insight and remorse”, and the clients and the firm did not suffer any financial loss.

The SRA said the solicitor showed “a reckless disregard of his regulatory obligations” in relation to the fees and “a reckless disregard of the risk of harm” to the building society.

But it decided that a £2,000 fine was the appropriate outcome “to uphold public confidence in the solicitors’ profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons because his actions were reckless”.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.

Loading animation