Solicitor jailed for forging wills to cover up client money theft


Mold Crown Court: Davies apologised for actions

A former solicitor has been jailed for four years and two months after admitting forging clients’ wills for his own benefit.

Peter Charles Davies, 62, from Abergwyngregyn, near Bangor, Gwynedd, cost them £241,000 combined, Mold Crown Court was told.

Davies admitted seven charges including fraud and forgery between 2010 and 2016.

He admitted three fraud charges, two counts of forgery, concealing criminal property and using a false instrument by submitting a forged will to a probate registry.

Davies was struck off in 2017 after taking the money from a client under a power of attorney after he had died – sometimes from cash points as he had access to the client’s cheque book and cards – because he did not tell the bank.

He also crated false wills for other deceased clients to pay off the legitimate beneficiaries of the first estate.

He said the beneficiaries were “hassling” him to distribute money from the estate, so he faked the wills to access money from other estates.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal said he thought it would be harder to detect his conduct given that both clients were dead.

His Honour Judge Rhys Rowlands in Mold Crown Court said Davies was receiving an average of £48,000 a year for five years on top of his salary.

“Quite what you did with all that money, only you know,” he said, according a local report of the hearing. “But the overwhelming inference is that it was not expended on everyday living expenses or debts. The effects on others have been profound.”

The judge described Davies’s actions as “a quite shocking breach of trust”.

John Wyn Williams from Exchange Chambers, mitigating for Davies, said his client had asked him to publicly apologise to the families affected, and his colleagues.

He said the defendant had amassed debts but that there was no extravagant lifestyle.

A total of £44,000 has since been repaid, the court heard, and there will now be an investigation under the Proceeds of Crime Act.




Blog


Does the Lloyd review mark the end of the Legal Services Act?

The Legal Services Board often generates eye-rolls and irritation from the leaders of the frontline regulators it oversees and of the representative bodies attached to them.


A familiar story?

There is no doubt that the rising cost of clinical negligence claims deserves attention. However, the system’s true cost driver is often not the claim itself.


When AI becomes a line on the client’s bill

On 23 June, Legora changed how it charges. The platform announced that its most capable product was moving away from a flat per-seat licence fee to consumption-based pricing


Loading animation