Solicitor jailed for fine wine scam ordered to repay thousands

Wilson: Three-year sentence

A solicitor who took £100,000 from a fine wine scam on investors has been ordered to pay back less than a quarter of the sum or face more jail time.

Michael Lloyd Wilson, 46, set up Global Wine Investments Ltd (GWI) at offices in the City of London to attract orders for expensive vintage wines such as Chateau Lafite, as an investment.

The company pulled in £360,716 from investors between April 2011 and September 2012, but spent only £60,000 on wine, with the rest going on wages, bonuses, luxuries and business costs.

Many of the victims never saw any wine at all and others were fobbed off with lower-quality bottles when they complained.

One man, who invested £42,500 but only received one case of wine worth £8,500, was so disgruntled he obtained a court winding-up order.

Some were told they did not even have an account when they called to check on their investment.

Mr Wilson – the sole signatory to the company bank account – blamed his team of salesman and claimed he was negligent rather than dishonest.

Nonetheless, Mr Wilson was convicted of possession of £100,000 in criminal property and jailed for three years in June 2016, and also disqualified as a director for seven years. He was struck off as a solicitor in September 2017.

After his conviction, he claimed a lot of the cash was spent on his father’s medical bills in Jamaica.

Mr Wilson has now been ordered to pay back £22,131 within three months or serve another 12 months in jail.

At the trial, he accepted it was his fault for not supervising his staff properly and said he was ashamed at how badly he had managed his company. Mr Wilson told jurors: “It wasn’t intentional. It wasn’t dishonest.”

In his mitigation to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, Mr Wilson stressed again that he had not intended to defraud people.

The SDT recorded: “He stated that he had always been ambitious and had aimed to be able to retire early after placing a company on the stock exchange. He now realised that his skill set was not suited to this ambition.”

As well as being a partner at a firm of solicitors at the time, he was also involved in a PPI claims management company and a property management company.

He said he had put £150,000 into the business but then taken money out to use for his other businesses, after which he lost control of the amounts he had been taken out and this resulted in “massive financial mismanagement”.

The tribunal recognised that Mr Wilson had had a “long previously unblemished record”, had shown genuine remorse and insight into his conduct. “It was clear the time he had spent in prison had had a profound effect on [him] and he had matured a great deal as a result.”

But though it concluded that Mr Wilson was unlikely to repeat his conduct, the tribunal said the criminal offence was so serious that an order striking him off was “appropriate and proportionate”.

    Readers Comments

  • Dori Bee says:

    I know Mr. Wilson very well as a decent, honest, kind and trustworthy person. I wish you would give him a second chance to do what he loves at a slower pace this time. He simply tried to get rich too quickly. He was trying to please his dad. Sorry

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Will solicitors finally be fans of transparency now?

Since the introduction of the SRA’s transparency rules in December 2018, I have been an advocate for law firms going further then the regulatory essentials.

A two-point plan to halve the size of the SRA

I have joked for many years that you could halve the size (and therefore cost) of the Solicitors Regulation Authority overnight by banning both client account and sole practitioners.

Key cyber and data security questions to ask a legal IT provider

One of the growing priorities that law firms face when considering a legal technology provider is cyber and data security, such as their responsibilities and cyber incident management.

Loading animation