Solicitor banned over boiler room adverts


Spain: solicitor dealt with unregulated stockbrokers

The Financial Services and Markets Tribunal has upheld a Financial Services Authority (FSA) decision permanently banning a solicitor from working in any capacity in financial services and fining him and the FSA-regulated law firm of which he is senior partner, £400,000.

The FSA said that Andrew Greystoke of Atlantic Law recklessly signed off Atlantic Law’s approval of 50 UK investment advertisements, between December 2005 and March 2007, issued by four unregulated Spanish stockbroking firms. ”He did so without taking reasonable steps to ensure that the advertisements were clear, fair and not misleading, and despite having reason to doubt that the Spanish firms would deal with UK consumers in an honest and reliable way,” it said in a statement.

The FSA said that Mr Greystoke accepted before the tribunal that these Spanish firms were boiler room share-scam operators. He approved their advertisements despite seeing consumer complaints and press articles clearly warning of their activities and despite negative previous experience of acting for other Spanish boiler room clients.

It continued: “The advertisements offered free research reports on respectable listed companies. As Mr Greystoke knew, the FSA had previously published warnings that this technique was commonly used by boiler rooms to obtain UK consumer telephone contact details. The advertisements approved by Mr Greystoke were misleading because their true purpose, which the tribunal found to have been “blindingly obvious” to Mr Greystoke, was not to offer the free reports, but to sell shares, whose value he knew to be at least doubtful.

“In fact, the Spanish companies subjected UK consumers who requested the reports, which Mr Greystoke knew to be of poor quality, to pressurised selling of high-risk illiquid shares in unlisted small companies. UK consumers who complained to the Spanish companies were subjected to threats and blackmail.”

The FSA reported that 130 consumers have complained to the FSA that they invested a total of over £3 million, of which they are likely to have lost much, if not all. The FSA also believes that many victims will not have complained, with the result that, as the tribunal found, the true loss caused by the advertisements was likely to be substantially more than £3 million.

Margaret Cole, FSA director of enforcement and financial crime, said: “Atlantic Law and Andrew Greystoke acted recklessly, without integrity and with a complete disregard of the risks to consumers. The tribunal’s decision supports our view that firms and individuals that assist boiler room operators should be brought to task. This has been a hard-fought case into which the FSA has put significant time and resources. It will send a strong message of deterrence to other firms and individuals that may be tempted to turn a blind eye to the legitimacy of their clients in exchange for fees or commission.”

The FSA said it received help in the case from the US Securities and Exchange Commission, the US Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, the Hong Kong Police, the Serious Fraud Office, the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, the Law Society, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and PLUS Markets plc.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

13 November 2019

The October PII renewal: Why the market changed

Since the abolition of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund, the October professional indemnity insurance renewal season has always been a challenge, but this year most law firms saw their premiums go up.

Read More

Loading animation