Solicitor agrees to leave profession over rule breaches


SRA: rebuke for solicitor who worked without a practising certificate

SRA: rebuke for solicitor who worked without a practising certificate

A solicitor who was unaware of what he should do after he failed to secure professional indemnity insurance has agreed to remove himself from the profession.

Despite similar cases having gone to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal of late – including one of a 79-year-old solicitor with almost 50 years of “exemplary service” – central London sole practitioner David W Beech reached a regulatory settlement agreement with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) that means he avoided being referred to the tribunal.

The agreement recorded that Mr Beech, who qualified in 1975, accepted that he had breach the rule by failing to notify the SRA that his firm had entered first into the extended indemnity period and then the cessation period, as required after failing to find insurance cover, and then failing to comply with undertakings given in a compliance plan dated 12 December 2013.

He also failed to keep accounting records properly written up to show his dealings with client money, and failed to obtain accountants’ reports.

In mitigation, Mr Beech said he was “unaware” of these obligations and that “no loss was occasioned to clients by reason of the admitted breaches”.

Mr Beech agreed to a £2,000 fine, to apply for his name to be removed from the roll of solicitors, and to not apply in future to be restored to it. Further, Mr Beech undertook not to be involved in any other capacity at a regulated law firm. He agreed to pay costs of £5,215.

Meanwhile, the SRA has used its sanctioning powers to issue a rebuke to Gemma Monday for practising for six months without a practising certificate. She was also found to have misled the SRA in relation to the type of work that she was undertaking between 25 July 2013 to 22 January 2014.

The conduct occurred whilst she was working as a consultant for Cardiff firm Insight Law, where she is currently listed as an associate solicitor.

She was also ordered to pay £600 in costs.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Planning for retirement
8 July 2020

In 2006 I started thinking about retirement whilst founding a boutique practice specialising in partnership and employment law. Ten years later, a friend told me that I would never be able to retire.


Time for a new regulatory settlement
3 July 2020

The problem with reform based on a compromise with vested interests is that it ends up being more pig’s ear than silk purse and the Legal Services Act 2007 is no exception.


Loading animation