Smaller law firms “face battle to keep junior partners” as HMRC deadline looms


HMRC: 5 July deadline

Smaller law firms are struggling to retain their junior partners in advance of tough new capital requirements set out by HM Revenue & Customs in its crackdown on fixed-share partners in LLPs avoiding PAYE tax, an executive search firm has claimed.

Fixed-share partners have until 5 July to make capital contributions of at least 25% of their annual earnings to their firms in order to prove to HMRC that they are self-employed and not liable to pay income tax and National Insurance Contributions as employees.

Search company Edward Drummond said many fixed-share partners at smaller firms are finding it difficult to raise the necessary funds to pay for the capital contribution because banks are far less willing to lend to smaller, less diversified firms.

In contrast, top-tier firms have managed to overcome this by negotiating with their lender on behalf of their fixed-share partners to provide them with long-term, low-interest loans that can spread the cost of the capital contribution. Some have even raised their pay to offset any interest payments those partners have to make on loans.

As a result, Edward Drummond director Dan Watts said, fixed-share partners at the smaller firms are instead looking at moving to rival firms where either they can join the equity or access such low-cost funding.

Mr Watts added that another potential downside of the new rules is that senior associates and salaried partners could now face fewer promotion opportunities at larger firms that have fixed-share partners.

As a result of fixed-share partners having to provide a greater financial commitment to their firm, he said there is now a larger gap between lawyers at the senior associate level and those that are equity partners.

“Becoming a fixed-share partner has always been a crucial stepping stone for senior associates and salaried partners looking to move up to equity partner,” he said.

“Now that fixed-share partners face such a significant financial commitment, senior associates and salaried partners could find it incredibly difficult to bridge the gap to become a fixed-share partner or equity partner. As a result salaried partners and senior associates could find it harder to get promoted.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Joe reevy says:

    Tough?
    Hardly. Being asked to put in £25k if your salary is £100k?

    I take a different view. If someone was wanting to be an part-owner of any business I was a part- owner of, and wasn’t willing to put such a sum in as part of the process (bearing in mind that the return on investment makes perfect sense just on the basis of the tax/NI savings), I wouldn’t want them on board.

    Lack of commitment + poor commercial judgment =????


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

18 November 2019

Protecting data in the cloud – a guide for law firms

Despite all of its advantages by way of ease and efficiency in a digital world, storing data within the cloud does not come without risks. Firms have to ensure they are safeguarded from a potentially disastrous loss.

Read More

Loading animation