Smaller law firms “face battle to keep junior partners” as HMRC deadline looms


HMRC: 5 July deadline

Smaller law firms are struggling to retain their junior partners in advance of tough new capital requirements set out by HM Revenue & Customs in its crackdown on fixed-share partners in LLPs avoiding PAYE tax, an executive search firm has claimed.

Fixed-share partners have until 5 July to make capital contributions of at least 25% of their annual earnings to their firms in order to prove to HMRC that they are self-employed and not liable to pay income tax and National Insurance Contributions as employees.

Search company Edward Drummond said many fixed-share partners at smaller firms are finding it difficult to raise the necessary funds to pay for the capital contribution because banks are far less willing to lend to smaller, less diversified firms.

In contrast, top-tier firms have managed to overcome this by negotiating with their lender on behalf of their fixed-share partners to provide them with long-term, low-interest loans that can spread the cost of the capital contribution. Some have even raised their pay to offset any interest payments those partners have to make on loans.

As a result, Edward Drummond director Dan Watts said, fixed-share partners at the smaller firms are instead looking at moving to rival firms where either they can join the equity or access such low-cost funding.

Mr Watts added that another potential downside of the new rules is that senior associates and salaried partners could now face fewer promotion opportunities at larger firms that have fixed-share partners.

As a result of fixed-share partners having to provide a greater financial commitment to their firm, he said there is now a larger gap between lawyers at the senior associate level and those that are equity partners.

“Becoming a fixed-share partner has always been a crucial stepping stone for senior associates and salaried partners looking to move up to equity partner,” he said.

“Now that fixed-share partners face such a significant financial commitment, senior associates and salaried partners could find it incredibly difficult to bridge the gap to become a fixed-share partner or equity partner. As a result salaried partners and senior associates could find it harder to get promoted.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Joe reevy says:

    Tough?
    Hardly. Being asked to put in £25k if your salary is £100k?

    I take a different view. If someone was wanting to be an part-owner of any business I was a part- owner of, and wasn’t willing to put such a sum in as part of the process (bearing in mind that the return on investment makes perfect sense just on the basis of the tax/NI savings), I wouldn’t want them on board.

    Lack of commitment + poor commercial judgment =????


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation