Smaller firms reducing office space as recovery gathers pace


On the up: Half of firms billed more fees

A quarter of small and mid-sized law firms have either downsized their office space this year or expect to shortly, according to Law Society research.

It also found growing confidence in the market, with 48% of firms reporting more new work in the first quarter of 2021 than in the previous quarter, and 52% billing more fees.

However, around a fifth of firms recorded falls in relation to new work coming in (21%), chargeable hours recorded (19%) and fees billed (19%).

The poll of 319 firms – the majority of which had a turnover of less than £2m – was the first in a new quarterly ‘pulse’ survey conducted by the society’s law management section.

The pandemic-induced move to home working, which has seen many large law firms rethink their office needs, appears to be having the same effect on their smaller brethren, with 15% of firms with physical offices saying they have reduced their office space in the last quarter and a further 10% saying they planned to do in the current one.

This was even though fee-earner headcount increased for 23% of firms, with 15% growing their support staff numbers. Only 4% of firms reported redundancies in the first quarter of 2021.

Two-fifths of firms had a better cash position compared to the previous quarter, while it was worse for one-fifth.

Just under half of the 148 firms that took out a Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme loan have actually used the money and the survey found that business confidence was strong, with 52% of firms predicting an improvement in fees and 46% an improvement in profitability over the next year.

The most commonly cited challenges for the next year were the wider economic conditions (46%) and cashflow (39%), followed by succession planning (36%) and changing employee working arrangements (34%).




Blog


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


AI can do the work but it cannot inherit the lawyer’s duty

What happens when lawyers delegate cognitive work to AI but remain personally responsible for judgements they may no longer have independently reasoned through?


Loading animation