Slater & Gordon will send out work to Linked to Law members


Holt: preferred member status

Slater & Gordon’s (S&G) new Linked to Law network will see cases going both ways between the alternative business structure and member firms, it has emerged.

Under Connect2Law – the Pannone brand which, as we reported last week, has gone with its former chief executive, David Jabarri – cases were only referred up the spokes of the referral network to Pannone and the other regional ‘hub’ firms, and not the other way round.

Emma Holt, the head of Pannone within Slater & Gordon, told Legal Futures that the changes to the network were “all about aligning it with the vision and values of Slater & Gordon”.

She said S&G’s various offices around the country would be the new hubs, while it would confer “preferred member” status on some firms that would enable them to receive work from S&G. This would be subject to service level agreements, and could either be overflow work or in areas that S&G does not currently cover.

Ms Holt said that many of the features of Connect2Law would be retained, such as non-poaching agreements, but some would be enhanced, including the procurement offering, which will extend to energy providers and remote dictation among other services. There will be a “new suite of products”, she promised.

The professional indemnity insurance scheme, offered through Willis, will also be relaunched, with risk and compliance advice available through its linked business CORRE.

At its height Connect2Law had approaching 3,000 member firms, but Ms Holt would not be drawn on how large Linked to Law would become. Pannone had been the ‘hub’ firm for the north-west and London, which between them had 900 members.

“We’re not just chasing size for the sake of it,” she said. “We have ambition but it’s related to ensuring firms want to be in a relationship with us and that it can add value to their clients…

“We have a good foundation of trust to build on. It’s about making sure it works for the firms and it works for us, and [ultimately] that people get access to the best firm for them.”




    Readers Comments

  • Anon says:

    Absolutely nothing new here but as expected. They already offered work out that they couldn’t do and had been doing so for years, doubt they’ll be sending out work out they can do?!

  • Anon says:

    Also other networks in the NW already well ahead of them now.

  • Ian Richardson says:

    A lot of other firms might have moved forward, however the S&G clout will be too strong for a lot of these other ‘competitors’ for example Law Share is too small to compete, and comment NW, is very insular, S&G are looking much further afield.

    What the new version of Connect2Law turns out to be under the stewardship of David Jabbari, now that will be interesting…

  • Anon says:

    Irrelevant, irrespective of the size of the network or how far S&G want to push, those other group’s have regional presence and support. They hve networks established partnerships, S&G don’t have this at all and at present only PLLP had a heritage of success in the NW with networks. I’d suggest that what is left is a mere distraction to what they are trying to build nationally. Networks are about relationships, they also have a long gestation period and S&G will be seen as a competitor being B2C. Reality is S&G don’t need this anymore. A matter of time unfortunately before LtoL sink’s into the abyss.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

14 November 2018

How accessible is your recruitment process?

Recognising the benefits of employing disabled people in the legal profession, and attracting talented disabled candidates is a great start, but of little use if your recruitment process is not inclusive nor accessible.

Read More