Slater & Gordon to sue over acquisition of Quindell’s professional services division


Stock Exchange: Watchstone dismisses validity of claim

Stock Exchange: Watchstone dismisses validity of claim

Slater & Gordon (S&G) has announced that it is taking legal action against Watchstone Group – formerly Quindell – over its £637m purchase of Quindell’s professional services division last year.

At the start of 2016 S&G unveiled a massive write-down of goodwill arising from the acquisition, which has led to eye-watering losses of just over A$1bn (£585m) for the last financial year.

S&G’s share price has tanked as a result of the acquisition, and it has had to renegotiate the terms of its debt with its lenders.

In a statement overnight to the Australian Stock Exchange, S&G said it had advised Watchstone that it intended to bring the claim under the share purchase agreement. It did not provide any more detail on the claim.

But it added: “SGH [Slater & Gordon Holdings] has previously informed the ASX that £50m of the purchase price of the acquisition would be held in escrow against warranty claims that may arise under the share purchase agreement.

“If claims made under that agreement cannot be resolved prior to the release date of the escrow (currently 29 November 2016), and subject to compliance with threshold requirements under the share purchase agreement, including a merits assessment by an independent barrister, part or the whole of that amount may be retained in the escrow account subject to resolution of the claim.”

In response, Watchstone said in a statement it did not believe that there were grounds for a claim and pledged to defend it “robustly”.

It continued: “Watchstone conducted a professional and transparent disposal process of the professional services division, assisted and advised by leading specialists. In addition, Watchstone allowed SGH the opportunity to complete an extensive and detailed due diligence process with the assistance and advice of a similarly specialist team.”

Regarding the escrow account monies, the statement said: “Following 29 November 2016, monies will be released to Watchstone from the warranty escrow unless, inter alia, Watchstone receives an opinion of a senior independent barrister stating that a given claim is more likely to succeed than not.

“The opinion will also quantify what such claim, if successfully brought against Watchstone, would be valued at and this amount would then be retained in the warranty escrow until the purported claim was resolved with any excess up to the £50m released to Watchstone.

“Prior to the giving of an opinion, Watchstone will have the opportunity to make submissions in respect of such matters.”

S&G is being sued in Australia by investors hit by the fall in the share price, while Your Legal Friend, also known as Camps Solicitors, is putting together a similar group action on behalf of investors in Quindell.




Blog


Does the Lloyd review mark the end of the Legal Services Act?

The Legal Services Board often generates eye-rolls and irritation from the leaders of the frontline regulators it oversees and of the representative bodies attached to them.


A familiar story?

There is no doubt that the rising cost of clinical negligence claims deserves attention. However, the system’s true cost driver is often not the claim itself.


When AI becomes a line on the client’s bill

On 23 June, Legora changed how it charges. The platform announced that its most capable product was moving away from a flat per-seat licence fee to consumption-based pricing


Loading animation