Slater & Gordon shareholders take what little they can get in class action settlement

Watson: best outcome from a terrible situation

Slater & Gordon has settled the first of three shareholder class action it is facing for A$36.5m (£21.6m), which the claimants’ solicitor said represented just a small fraction of their losses but was a better than “the diabolical alternative which meant likely insolvency for Slater & Gordon”.

The ‘in principle’ settlement, which is made without admission of liability and is subject to court approval, will see S&G’s insurers pay A$32.5m and the hedge funds that bought nearly all of the company’s debt contributing a further A$4m.

It preserves shareholders’ ability to continue to pursue third parties for their proportionate share of the overall responsibility for losses to shareholders (known as apportionable claims), but will mean non-apportionable claims cannot be brought against third parties.

The claimants’ solicitor, Andrew Watson, the national head of class actions at Australian law firm Maurice Blackburn, said the settlement was “the best outcome from a terrible situation for shareholders, given the diabolical alternative which meant likely insolvency for Slater & Gordon”.

He said S&G did not have any assets that would be available to fund a settlement or satisfy a judgment against the company as its level of secured debt significantly exceeded the value of its assets, and, as secured creditors, the new owners of S&G’s debt hold a fixed and floating charge over those assets.

As a result, the only source of potential recovery from the company for shareholders was its insurance, the policy limit on which was “unexpectedly low” and represented “on any measure, only a small fraction of the class members’ losses”.

Mr Watson said: “Given the insurance policy limits, and the fact that Slater & Gordon’s defence costs for all actions also come out of the insurance, the proposed settlement will avoid further erosion of the available funds and return to class members as much of what remains under the policies as possible.”

S&G still faces another shareholder class action, while a third has been threatened.

The firm’s shares jumped 10% on news of the settlement, to 8c.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Should the SRA introduce tougher sanctions for AML breaches?

We have recently seen the Solicitors Regulation Authority fining law firms across England and Wales over a lack of proper anti-money laundering policies and procedures.

EHCPs and the uphill struggle for justice

The staggering truth behind the education system supporting children with special education needs and disabilities is that 80% of SEND children don’t receive the regular in-school support they need.

How to practise in Australia without re-qualifying

Those of you looking for a lateral career shift will be encouraged by the UK government’s announcement in June that UK lawyers will be allowed to practise in Australia without having to requalify

Loading animation