Shareholders target Quindell legal action

Morrissey: Rapidly building cohort of shareholder claimants

Shareholders who claim they were misled by one-time alternative business structure (ABS) Quindell have began legal action over the losses they suffered as a result.

London litigation boutique Harcus Parker yesterday sent a letter before action to AIM-listed Watchstone Group PLC – formerly Quindell – on behalf of institutional and high net-worth investors.

The action is being brought under section 90A of Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, which provides a remedy for misstatements and omissions by listed companies.

The news comes just weeks after Watchstone settled Slater & Gordon’s £637m claim in deceit and breach of warranty for just £11m.

The Financial Reporting Council has so far sanctioned two firms of auditors – Arrandco Audit (formerly RSM Tenon Audit) and KPMG – over their conduct in relation to Quindell’s accounts, including failing to “exercise sufficient professional scepticism”.

Its investigation came after Quindell’s 2014 accounts were published with substantial restatements of prior year revenues, profits and net assets. This turned its 2013 £83m profit after tax into a loss of £68m.

A Serious Fraud Office investigation into Quindell has been going on for more than four years.

The claim alleges that, between 2011 to 2014, Quindell provided misleading information and/or failed to disclose material facts to its auditors. It also alleges misleading statements in relation to various of its subsidiary companies.

Further, the shareholders claim that Quindell:

  • Issued statements about its planned listing on the full London Stock Exchange when there was no reasonable prospect of this occurring;
  • Delayed disclosing publicly by more than a year that it was being investigated by the Financial Reporting Council;
  • Overstated the likely contribution to its revenue of an increase in noise-induced hearing loss cases;
  • Delayed informing the market that Canaccord had resigned as its joint broker and financial adviser; and
  • Issued misleading statements relating to the financing of directors’ share transactions, including those of former chief executive Rob Terry.

Jennifer Morrissey, a partner at Harcus Parker, said: “Between 2011 and mid-2015, Quindell regularly published upbeat market announcements about its financial good health, when it knew the truth was significantly different.

“We are rapidly building a cohort of shareholders who suffered significant losses when the share price collapsed when the truth started coming out, and we hope Watchstone will recognise the failures of its predecessor and compensate them without the need for a drawn-out legal fight.”

Shareholders of Quindell between May 2011 and 5 August 2015 may be eligible to join the action.

A shareholder action first mooted in 2015 by Your Legal Friend, the consumer-facing brand of Liverpool law firm Camps, has still not been advanced.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


How could instant messaging transform your law firm?

The vast majority of law firms have no instant messaging capability. In what other sector is that the case? Most stick to traditional communications channels. In 2021 there’s no good reason for that.

From cost saving to revenue making – post-pandemic commercial success

Commercial success is the driving force for ambitious law firms and it should come as no surprise that many have a renewed determination to re-evaluate their businesses in the wake of Covid-19.

Success in-house – what people don’t tell you about how to get there

TV dramas have made many people think that the legal profession consists of heroes (or villains) in high-flying firms or public prosecution. In reality, nearly a quarter of solicitors work in-house.

Loading animation