SFO charges three men over Axiom fund collapse

SFO: Six-year investigation

Two former solicitors and a former independent financial adviser have been charged with multiple offences in connection with the collapse of the Axiom Legal Financing Fund.

The Cayman Islands-based fund – which lent money to several law firms to pay for disbursements, mainly for personal injury cases – closed in October 2012 in the wake of allegations of fraud, and went into receivership in February 2013 owing investors around £120m.

The Serious Fraud Office announced on Friday that it has charged Timothy Schools, Richard Emmett and David Kennedy with carrying out a fraudulent scheme to divert money from the fund for their own benefit.

The SFO began its investigation in 2014, although it only went public in 2017.

Mr Schools, 59, is seen as the main figure behind the fund and was struck off in 2014.

He has been charged with three counts of fraudulent trading, one count of fraud and one count of transferring criminal property.

Mr Emmett, 47, was struck off in 2018. He has been charged with one count of fraudulent trading and one count of being concerned in an arrangement which facilitates the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by another.

David Kennedy, 67, a former independent financial adviser, has been charged with one count of fraudulent trading.

Their case will be listed at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 30 September.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Katie McKenna

How is your internal weather today?

Like the weather, our feelings and perspectives change and undulate throughout the day. When you look outside, you get a snapshot of the world in that moment.

Anything else to say about SDLT?

SDLT is not stamp duty. This is something I have to say to firms too often. Whilst it has some of the same words in its name, it is not the former tax on property deeds that existed pre-December 2003.

Loading animation