Senior solicitor wins libel claim over misconduct allegations

Sadler: Fully vindicated
Photo: LinkedIn

A senior solicitor at the Environment Agency has won his libel action against the owners of a garden centre business who accused him of professional misconduct in prosecuting one of them.

Dylan Sadler received an apology, damages and costs from Joyners Plants Ltd, which runs the Plants Galore garden centres in Devon.

After he successfully prosecuted one of its directors for environmental offences, Joyners Plants posted a press release on its website – which it circulated to local councillors, media outlets and MPs – accusing Mr Sadler of serious professional misconduct in how he pursued the case.

It accused him of inducing a convicted criminal to concoct false evidence, pursuing a prosecution which had no prospect of success and of being a solicitor willing to go to any length to obtain a conviction, whether fair or not.

In a preliminary ruling on meaning, the High Court in December held that the press release was defamatory. The defendants then accepted liability and agreed to pay Mr Sadler damages and costs.

In a joint statement in open court on Monday, the defendants retracted the false allegations and apologised “unreservedly for the damage and upset”.

In a statement published on its website, the company added: “To demonstrate the sincerity of this apology, Joyners Plants have also paid Mr Sadler compensation and his legal costs.”

Mr Sadler said: “I am delighted to have been fully vindicated in respect of the very serious and damaging allegations which had been published about me and to have received the unqualified apology in court.

“The accusations went to the heart of my hard-won professional reputation and I had no option but to take action to clear my name.”

Penningtons Manches Cooper and counsel Aidan Eardley acted for Mr Sadler. Penningtons partner Jeremy Clarke-Williams said: “Lawyers do not often litigate personally in relation to matters arising from carrying out their professional duties.

“However in this case Mr Sadler was left with no choice because of the groundless and upsetting attack on his integrity. The apology given by the defendants in open court completes the vindication he deserved and required.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Automated justice: striking the balance in injury claims

No professional sector is immune from automation – even the law. However, the adoption of automated systems to settle routine injury claims raises a number of important ethical questions.

Conveyancers: are you afraid of outsourcing?

For many years, outsourcing has been seen as a bit of a scary prospect within the conveyancing sector. But thanks to the stamp duty holiday, conveyancers are now realising some of the many benefits.

You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?

Loading animation