Second time lucky for top accountants after “hell” of dealing with SRA over ABS bid

Snyder: major change of attitude

Snyder: major change of attitude

Sir Michael Snyder, senior partner of top 20 accountants Kingston Smith, has welcomed a change of approach to multi-disciplinary practices at the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) after describing the “sheer hell” of the firm’s first attempt to become an alternative business structure (ABS).

Sir Michael, co-chairman of the government’s Professional Business Services Council, said his firm should shortly be licensed as an ABS by the SRA after inappropriate rules and the “attitude of SRA staff” forced his firm to abandon its initial ABS application after 18 months.

He told yesterday’s Legal Futures Regulation and Compliance Conference that the attitude seemed to be that accountants were a “lower form of life”, unable to understand concepts such as conflicts of interest and confidentiality.

He said the regulator’s responses “became nasty” when, after a year, he “fought back” and complained to the Lord Chancellor and the Legal Services Board.

Sir Michael’s firm has since become the first to be regulated as an ABS by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).

He said there had now been a “major change of attitude” by the SRA, which had enabled Big Four accountants like EY to obtain licences as multi-disciplinary practices (MDPs).

“The SRA has recognised that its rules simply did not recognise MDPs. This is a result of learning through the application process, pressure from the LSB and government, and a change in culture at the top.”

He added that the SRA had acknowledged the need to move away from “one size fits all regulation” and the fact it was heading in the direction of more proportionate regulation was very welcome.

Sir Michael anticipated that, because of this new approach, his firm would “hopefully be the next” accountancy firm ABS to be approved as a MDP by the SRA.

He said the firm’s current ABS licence from the ICAEW enabled it to provide a “holistic suite” of probate services. However, legal services, such as preparing wills and applying for probate, only made up a “tiny proportion” of its offering to clients.

Even when the firm was licensed by the SRA, Sir Michael said the “limited” legal services it would offer, for example on M&As or HR issues, would be “incidental” to the firm’s wider work. “We have no intention of doing conveyancing, larger M&A, family or criminal work.”

He said that Kingston Smith would hand back its ICAEW ABS licence once this happens, but would not be drawn on whether the firm would return to the institute if and when it has the power to regulate all of the reserved legal activities, rather than just probate as now.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Retrospective or not retrospective, that is the question

As the debate heats up over the Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, it is crucial to understand what is the true vice in retrospective legislation.

Harnessing the balance of technology and human interaction

In today’s legal landscape, finding the delicate balance between driving efficiency via use of technology and providing a personalised service is paramount to success.

AI’s legal leap: transforming law practice with intelligent tech

Just like in numerous other industries, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector is proving to be a game-changer.

Loading animation