Scottish Bar chief resigns over train chat indiscretion


Jackson: Will resign by 30 June at the latest

The head of the Scottish Bar has announced his intention to resign after being caught talking on a train about his client, Alex Salmond, in a derogatory manner.

Gordon Jackson QC referred himself to the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (SLCC) last month in the wake of the Sunday Times publishing a recording of his comments, taken by a fellow passenger.

All complaints about Scottish lawyers start at the SLCC. But, as with the Legal Ombudsman south of the border it only handles service issues itself; conduct matters are referred to the relevant professional body to investigate for possible disciplinary action.

This would lead to the Faculty of Advocates – the Scottish equivalent of the Bar Council – having to investigate its own dean (chair).

In a statement issued through the Faculty’s Twitter feed on Friday, Mr Jackson said: “I have intimated my decision to resign as Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, with effect from 30 June, at the latest.

“It would not, however, be appropriate for me to remain as Dean at a time when the Faculty was considering disciplinary proceedings regarding my conduct.

“Accordingly, if, before that date, the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission remits the recent complaint for consideration by the Faculty’s Complaints Committee, I will stand down as Dean immediately. I do not intend to make any further comment.”

On the recording, which was made during Mr Salmond’s trial, Mr Jackson was heard saying: “I don’t know much about senior politicians but he was quite an objectionable bully to work with in a way I don’t think Nicola [Sturgeon] is. I think he was a nasty person to work for… a nightmare to work for.”

He then appeared to say Mr Salmond could be seen as “a sex pest but he’s not charged with that”.

A jury in Edinburgh last month found Mr Salmond, the former leader of the SNP and first minister of Scotland, not guilty on 12 charges of sexual assault, while another was not proven.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

4 June 2020

Reflecting on the spring PII renewal season

I reported last year that the October PII market was a challenging environment and many practices paid more for their cover. This trend of increased premiums continued into this spring.

Read More

Loading animation