Retiring law firm partners to be offered short cut to senior judiciary


Lord Thomas

Thomas: “huge disadvantages” in diversity quotas

There is to be a drive to recruit retiring law firm partners to the senior judiciary in a bid to improve diversity, it has emerged.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, said he is looking at a “more sensible way” of recruiting partners who retire early onto the High Court bench.

Speaking earlier this week, Lord Thomas said partners retire in their early 50s, the age at which the senior judiciary is recruited.

“We are going to run, early in the New Year, a competition for people who are not recorders who can then become deputy high court judges – the recent legislation permits us to do this – and we hope that will then recruit people to where the real problem is, which is the much more senior levels.”

The LCJ said government lawyers would also be targeted, noting that in the senior civil service about 50% of staff are women and 10% from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds.

He said there was no reason why government lawyers could not “come and do a very good job in the judiciary” and were “a very, very important line of ensuring that the executive complies with the law”.

Lord Thomas said government lawyers made up a “much better pool” than law firm partners, where only 18-20% of partners were female.

Lord Thomas said he believed that imposing diversity quotas for judicial appointments, as recommended earlier this month by an independent report for the Labour Party, was “not necessary” as long as “positive action” was taken and “one appreciates that results will come and they are coming.”

The LCJ said there were “huge disadvantages in them and other proposals that, in a sense, upset what is probably regarded as the finest judiciary in the world”.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation