Research presses case to offer legal advice alongside healthcare

Genn: Welfare legal services reduce pressure on NHS

Providing legal assistance services in healthcare settings can both improve access to advice and support health services to manage non-clinical demand, new research has argued.

It said integrating health and social welfare legal services should be considered “an essential element in the development of social prescribing”, that is, enabling GPs to refer patients to non-medical support services.

The first survey of its kind has found that almost 400 social welfare legal services exist across England and Wales in healthcare settings such as GP practices, but nearly half have funding for just a matter of months.

The research, funded by the Legal Education Foundation, was carried out by Professor Dame Hazel Genn and her University College, London (UCL) colleague Sarah Beardon as part of a scoping effort to see whether cuts in legal aid for the poorest people should prompt a national health justice strategy.

It found the network of healthcare-based advice centres had grown up organically over many years – their development “bottom-up, leading to diverse and innovative examples” – but there was a “strong case” for integrating social welfare legal and health services more formally.

UCL itself has run a legal advice clinic in the London Borough of Newham – one of the most deprived in the country – providing legal services to health clinics and GP practices and staffed by UCL law students, supervised by qualified lawyers.

The research found 380 advice services, most of them helping clients with welfare benefits issues such as filling in application forms and representing people at tribunals, with many also offering housing and debt advice, had low levels of long-term financing.

Some 40% of services had funding for less than a year, given by charities, local authorities, or NHS sources.

Professionals working in the sector said the services helped reduce pressure on health services – with consequent savings in public money – but resource constraints and the difficulty of showing hard outcomes presented challenges.

The authors said that official backing from NHS partnerships and having legal services based in healthcare settings helped make them “become part of accepted ways of working”.

They added: “When effective partnerships were established, they were found to be highly valued by healthcare professionals.”

Such collaborations had “potential to improve the health and wellbeing of individuals, as well as to support healthcare services in delivering holistic care that addresses the underlying determinants of health and reduces pressure on frontline services”, they said.

“As services that facilitate access to the most basic needs and rights which are fundamental to health and wellbeing (such as sufficient income and appropriate housing), social welfare legal services should form core components of any holistic social prescribing scheme.

“Greater recognition of the contribution of social welfare law to social determinants of health and health inequalities is needed.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Microsoft 365’s dirty little secret

Microsoft 365 (formerly called Office 365) is one of the most widely used cloud services in the world, controlling around 48% of the market share for major office suites.

A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Loading animation