Reprimand for legal executive who asked SRA to keep quiet


Shh: SRA rejected entreaty to stay quiet

A chartered legal executive has been reprimanded for asking the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) not to tell his own regulator that it had investigated him.

Unfortunately for him, the SRA and CILEx Regulation have an information-sharing agreement.

Daniel Jackson, who became a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) in 2012, was reported to the SRA by his former employer, a solicitors’ firm, following his dismissal for gross misconduct.

The SRA investigated and eventually found no evidence of professional misconduct against him.

However, Mr Jackson failed to declare the investigation to CILEx Regulation, as required by its rules.

The SRA provided CILEx Regulation with copies of its correspondence with Mr Jackson, which showed that early on in its investigation it had asked him whether he had informed his regulator.

He replied by email: “I have not told them due to at first not knowing if I would ever get back into a law firm…

“I would appreciate it if you also did not tell CILEx as they may take it upon themselves to inform my current employers… I would appreciate it if you could inform me if you feel you need to inform them.”

The SRA subsequently confirmed to Mr Jackson that it had informed CILEx Regulation and advised him to contact his regulator, which he failed to do.

CILEx Regulation’s professional conduct panel found that he had failed to notify the regulator of the SRA investigation as soon as he became aware of it, in breach of the CILEx rules, and attempted to conceal the investigation, thereby failing to behave with honesty and integrity.

The panel reprimanded Mr Jackson and warned him about his future conduct.

‘Learning points’ provided by CILEx Regulation in a report on the case in the CILEx Journal said: “CILEx Regulation has an agreement with a number of other regulators, including the SRA, to share information about their regulated members.

“Members should, therefore, be open and honest with their regulators as a failure to do so can and often does, result in disciplinary action being taken against them.”

Meanwhile, CILEx Regulation chief executive Helen Whiteman is to leave the organisation next month to take on the same role at the Chartered Institute of Taxation. Recruitment for her successor will begin over the summer.

She said: “I am very lucky and immensely proud to have been a small part of CILEx’s story. Whoever follows me will inherit a hardworking, knowledgeable, committed and fun team, supported by a strong board.”

Sam Younger, CILEx Regulation’s chair, said: “Helen has been an exceptional leader at CILEx Regulation, overseeing the organisation’s growth and development during a time of rapid change in the legal sector.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Civil enforcement – progress at last with CJC report

‘When do I get my money?’ is a question that litigators acting for successful parties are used to fielding. The value of judgments is of course in the recovery made.


Paralegals: Progression and recognition are key to retaining talent

Many lawyers could not do their jobs without the support of paralegals and for law firms to remain competitive, paralegals need to be central to their business.


PII excess: a growing risk for consultant solicitors

As more solicitors choose to work as consultants, a concerning contractual trend has emerged – the passing of professional indemnity insurance excess liabilities onto consultants.


Loading animation