Regulators set out terms of training review

Townsend: focusing has been on regulating businesses until now

The three biggest legal regulators have set out the terms of their two-year joint review of education and training.  

The review – being undertaken by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the Bar Standards Board and ILEX Professional Standards (IPS) – will first examine the educational requirements placed upon individuals entering the sector and their regulatory function.  

It will also look at the requirements for continuing education for individuals and entities (including continuing professional development, accreditation and other quality assurance schemes), and the requirements placed upon those delivering approved education.  

The regulators plan to appoint an external research team in February 2011. The review is expected to produce significant policy findings at various points before its conclusion in two years’ time.  

As revealed on Legal Futures yesterday, the Legal Services Board had intended to undertake this review itself, but has agreed to take an active oversight role instead.  

The review will ask the following specific questions:    

  • What should be the contribution of legal education and training to the delivery of the regulatory objectives set out in the Legal Services Act 2007, taking account of:
    • The likely shape of and demands on legal services by 2020 in the light of changing consumer/client demand, technological change and other factors;
    • The effects that the shape of legal services may have upon the legal and other skills demanded from different kinds of lawyers and others employed in legal services in the future;
    • The need for high-quality, competitive legal services and education and training providers and high ethical standards for lawyers and legal services entities;
    • The need to promote social mobility and diversity;
    • Forthcoming changes to the education sector and how these may affect legal education and training.
  • How might implementation of the Legal Services Act affect legal education and training?
  • To what extent (if any) should the formal regulation of legal education and training be extended to include groups other than those regulated by the approved regulators – for example, paralegals?
  • What can or should be done to address the issue of career development and mobility between branches of the legal profession?
  • What recommendations should be made to the Legal Services Board, the approved regulators and other bodies?

SRA chief executive Antony Townsend said: “Ensuring that solicitors and others delivering legal services are properly educated and trained is just as important as making sure that firms and individuals conduct their businesses properly. The two areas of regulatory work are complementary and inter-dependant. 

“Much of the recent focus of regulatory activity has been on reforming the structures for regulating legal businesses. This review will ensure that serious thought, based on thorough research and comprehensive consultation with all interested parties, is now given to education and training.  

Ruth Deech, chairwoman of the Bar Standards Board, said: “We are pleased to be working with the SRA and IPS on this regulator-led review of legal education and training. We look forward to building on our previous evaluations of the bar professional training course and pupillage and our current work on the continuing professional development requirements for barristers. The collaborative approach to this review will ensure a positive future for the legal profession.”  

IPS chairman Alan Kershaw added: “This is an important piece of work. IPS is keen to bring its unique contribution to the review and to work with all of the regulators to ensure that the competence and qualification standards of everyone providing legal services are appropriate to meet the needs of customers and the requirements of the Legal Services Act. It will bring together the work to determine how well the current arrangements will fit the new landscape, which individual regulators have already begun.”  

The core aims of the review are to ensure that the ethical standards and levels of competence of those delivering legal services in regulated law firms are sufficient to secure a high standard of service for clients, and to support the public interest and the rule of law. The review will build on and feed into the regulators’ existing projects in this area.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Retrospective or not retrospective, that is the question

As the debate heats up over the Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, it is crucial to understand what is the true vice in retrospective legislation.

Harnessing the balance of technology and human interaction

In today’s legal landscape, finding the delicate balance between driving efficiency via use of technology and providing a personalised service is paramount to success.

AI’s legal leap: transforming law practice with intelligent tech

Just like in numerous other industries, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector is proving to be a game-changer.

Loading animation