Referral fees at root of junior barristers’ woes, says Bar Council

Referral fees distorting advocacy, Bar claims

An increasing tendency among solicitors to pay referral fees to each other and to use solicitor-advocates is diverting work away from junior barristers, ultimately threatening the quality of the judiciary, according to the Bar Council.

In an advisory note, the council’s ethics committee drew attention to the Bar’s prohibition of referral fees and warned that barristers were coming under pressure from “certain solicitors” to enter into referral agreements.

Ostensibly the non-binding advice simply reminded barrister that the payment by a barrister was forbidden under the Bar Standards Board’s Handbook, a position strongly supported by the Bar Council’s professional practice committee (PPC).

But buried in an explanatory annex following the advice was a powerful analysis of the troubles afflicting the junior Bar, which the PPC suggested would only be made worse by cuts in legal aid funding.

It amounted to an argument for the extension of a referral fee ban beyond personal injury cases to an across-the-board ban. Referral fees have a “negative impact” on clients and “operate against the public interest”, the PPC said, adding: “They threaten to compromise the integrity of those who receive them. At best they limit the client’s choice of advocate: at worst, they can result in the lay client receiving a substandard service.”

The payment of referral fees between solicitors’ firms and freelance solicitor-advocates was “now commonplace”, particularly in criminal practice, the committee said.

Public funding cuts, such as a further reduction of police station fixed fees would “incentivise” solicitors “to brief advocates based on economic criteria rather than on which advocate would provide the best representation for the lay client”.

Painting a bleak picture of the future of the family and criminal Bars, the PPC said young barristers were being frozen out of work that was vital to their earning capacity now and to the experience they needed for the future. The quality and diversity of the junior Bar would suffer, as would the senior Bar and judiciary, it suggested.

“The payment of referral fees within the legal market is… having a damaging effect upon the viability of practice for younger members of the Bar, particularly where representation is publicly funded. In the long run this can only damage the whole of the Bar…”

“The payment between solicitors of referral fees and the consequent increased use of solicitor-advocates has diverted work away from young practitioners at the family and criminal Bars. As a result, young barristers are losing valuable experience at an important stage in their career, are suffering financial hardship and, in crime, are finding difficulty in establishing a Crown Court practice.

“This has affected not only those barristers who are currently at the Bar, but is likely to discourage the brightest and best applicants from coming to the Bar.”

It continued: “Pupils typically begin their career at the Bar many thousands of pounds in debt. An effect of referral fees is ultimately likely to be to dissuade those from less privileged backgrounds from a career at the Bar.

“The junior Bar will not only see the quality of its new members diminish, but also its diversity. In time, this will impact upon the quality and diversity of the senior Bar and the judiciary.”


    Readers Comments

  • Of course one idea would be to legalise and formulise referrals completely! Change the way it is handled entirely. Create a website on which everyone is registered and to which lay clients can have access. This way, lay clients can see which barristers / solicitors have bid for their work, how much they will cost and more importantly what their client service ratings are (clients and lay clients would have the ability to give feedback on the relevant lawyer).

    Suddenly the referral business stops being purely about the money and becomes client focussed. Just an idea!

  • Robert Rhodes QC says:

    I sympathise with the junior Bar. I am on the Professional Practice Committee of the Bar Council and am aware of the considerable problems that can be caused by unscrupulous attempts by some solicitors to use referral fees. Referral fees are corrupting and against the public interest, because they mean that counsel is instructed on the basis of his willingness to give a kick-back to the solicitor, and not on whether he is the best person for the case.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.

Loading animation