Rebukes for solicitors who used legal aid cash to cover their overheads


Money: non-solicitor misappropriated money

Money: non-solicitor misappropriated client cash

Three solicitors who used legal aid money meant to pay for disbursements to cover their firm’s overheads have been rebuked by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Simon Frank Rollason, Sarah Justine Cooper and Shaun Davies were managers of Telford firm Cooper Rollason, which closed in March 2014.

A notice published by the SRA on Friday said they failed to transfer payments received from the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) in respect of disbursements to client account within 14 days of receipt and failed to ensure compliance with the accounts rules.

Rather, it said, “they used money received by the LAA for professional disbursements to cover overheads of the firm”, in breach of various rules, principles and outcomes.

Further, Mr Rollason was found to have failed to provide the SRA with the ledger for two clients as he had not kept the accounts records for six years, and Mr Davies was found to have failed to report non-compliance by the firm of the rules in his role as the compliance officer for finance and administration.

Mr Rollason currently works as a consultant at Hamer Childs Solicitors, and Ms Cooper at NJP Solicitors, while Mr Davies is working part-time at PCB Solicitors. In addition to the written rebukes, each was ordered to pay costs of £200.

Meanwhile, in another decision, the SRA has banned non-solicitor Christophe Kelvin Du Tertre from being involved in the profession without its consent.

It recorded that while employed by Blake Lapthorn as a fee-earner in the firm’s French private assets and tax team, Mr Du Tertre misappropriated £3,562 of client money. He was also ordered to pay £600 in costs.

Separately, Howard Hemley, a one-time office services clerk at City firm Slaughter and May, was made subject to the same order restricting the employment of non-solicitors.

The SRA said that he was found to have misappropriated paper and other stationery from the firm worth approximately £3,000. The firm dismissed him on 16 December 2015. He was also ordered to pay £300 in costs.




Blog


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


Loading animation