Rebuke for firm that acted on both sides without client consent


SRA: Informed consent required

A law firm that acted on both sides of a conveyancing transaction without obtaining consent from the buyer has been rebuked by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Norwich-based Leadenhall Law Group said it had told the client in its paperwork that it was also acting for the seller but did not seek their informed consent.

According to a notice published yesterday by the SRA, the client terminated the retainer for the purchase and also a lease extension in March 2022 after discovering the firm was acting for the other side as well.

Leadenhall said it had considered if a conflict could occur but, as it was an auction sale, there would be no negotiations.

Further, it believed it had sufficient safeguards in place. While the seller’s solicitor was situated in the Norwich office, the buyer’s solicitor was situated in the firm’s London office.

Each office used separate and different case management systems, meaning “there was no risk of contamination or the fee-earners acting on each side of the transaction being able to view the other party’s file”.

Leadenhall told the SRA that the client must have been aware it acted for both parties, as it was stated in literature provided to them. The regulator said: “However, they admit that the client never specifically agreed to this, but that they believe the client would have agreed had they asked them.”

Informed consent is a requirement of the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms, however, once a firm has decided it can exercise the exception that allows it to act for two or more clients in the same matter.

In mitigation, Leadenhall said it has since changed its policy and no longer acted for both buyer and seller in a property transaction. It also stressed that it did refer to SRA guidance and considered it had sufficient safeguards in place to enable it to act for both parties.

The SRA said a sanction was required “to uphold public trust and confidence in the delivery of legal services”.





Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Reshaping workplace culture in law firms

The legal industry is at a critical point as concerns about “toxic law firm culture” reach an all-time high. The profession often prioritises performance at the cost of their wellbeing.


Will solicitors finally be fans of transparency now?

Since the introduction of the SRA’s transparency rules in December 2018, I have been an advocate for law firms going further then the regulatory essentials.


A two-point plan to halve the size of the SRA

I have joked for many years that you could halve the size (and therefore cost) of the Solicitors Regulation Authority overnight by banning both client account and sole practitioners.


Loading animation