Quran-quoting barrister receives apology from counsel who asked him to stop


Khan: All is forgiven

The barrister who asked a fellow counsel to stop posting quotes from the Quran on LinkedIn has apologised and said they should not have sent the message.

As we reported last week, Tahir Khan, head of Shariah law at Clerksroom, described the message from the barrister – whose identity he has not disclosed – as a “great illustration of unconscious or conscious bias towards my religious beliefs and my law practice”.

He pointed out to the barrister that the Quran formed the framework which governed how he advised his clients.

Mr Khan has now shared a follow-up message from the barrister, which said: “I realise that I should not have sent you the message that I did and profusely apologise for doing so. Please accept my apologies.

“I realise now that your messages have comforted people and some have found them inspirational. It was not appropriate for me to have suggested that your posts were not appropriate and I really did not mean to cause any offence.

“There are very difficult times and we all need to support each other.”

In response, Mr Khan thanked him for the message. “I extend my hand in friendship, my learned friend (virtual of course). No hard feelings, all [is] forgiven.”

Drawing from the Quran, he said “forgiving others improves your physical ability and lightens your heart, which makes it a great source of reward from Allah”.

He shared the exchange with his LinkedIn followers, who welcomed the outcome.

James Pereira QC wrote: “This – what you have done – is what inclusion looks like. We find space to listen; we recognise the ability to learn, to change; we acknowledge our differences and we find connection on common ground; we pause, reflect, move forward, carrying each other together.

“I salute whoever it was who criticised your posts and was then able to reflect and change; and thank you Tahir for modelling the compassion lacking in so much dialogue today.”




Blog


Is your Google Ads budget funding your competitors’ AI visibility?

If your cost-per-click has crept up again this year, you’ve probably assumed the market simply got more expensive. That’s the wrong way to read what’s happening.


Containing the spread of unapproved AI

Nearly 60% of fee-earners admit to using unapproved tools (like free versions of ChatGPT). Yet 68% of firm leaders are confident there is zero risk of unapproved AI being used for client work.


When AI adoption goes wrong, costs add up fast

City AM recently reported that London is fighting to claim the title of ‘global capital of legal AI’. However, it’s crucial we remember that adoption alone does not create value.


Loading animation