Quindell in freefall as it loses 20% of share value for second day running


Terry: another 250,000 shares purchased

Alternative business structure Quindell plc suffered another day of dizzying collapse in its share price on Tuesday, with a second consecutive 20% fall.

As concern over the continues, the AIM-listed legal outsourcing business has now lost more than half of its value in just three weeks.

Yesterday it fell to just 75.5p, having been 162p on 22 October.

The share price has been in freefall for much of the last six months, during which there was a 15:1 share consolidation, making comparison with earlier in the year harder.

However, analysts put the share price as being the equivalent of around 650p when it was riding high at the start of 2014, before the consolidation. But it has not recovered since being hit in April by the highly critical report on Quindell by little-known American analysts Gotham City Research.

A stream of announcements from the company about directors buying more shares as a display of confidence – just yesterday, chairman Rob Terry bought another 250,000 at 97p – has been unable to stem the sharp recent slide first below 150p and now below 100p.

The confusing nature of Quindell’s stock exchange announcements are unlikely to have helped. In trying to clarify the nature of the finance arrangement that saw three directors, including Mr Terry, hand over shares to Equities First Holdings (EFH), an announcement on Monday was unclear as to whether EFH might sell the shares.

First it said that “EFH may take any action it deems appropriate in relation to the transferred shares and is under no obligation to hold or retain the transferred shares though it has undertaken not to vote them”.

But then a quote from Mr Terry said: “In entering into the sale and repurchase agreements to provide finance, each of us purchasing directors relied upon assurances from EFH that, notwithstanding EFH’s legal rights, the custom and practice of EFH was that the shares transferred would not be disposed of outright, other than in a default event.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Time to get real: Why authenticity should be at the heart of your marketing

Authenticity is becoming an increasingly important part of marketing. Glossy adverts are no longer enough; these days consumers want to connect with brands on a more personal level.


Why it’s time to embrace health justice partnerships

In July, I completed a second-year evaluation of a health justice project in Australia amid the continuing interest in England and Wales in co-locating health and legal services.


What does the SRA’s consumer protection review mean for law firms?

Practitioners need to be aware of the SRA’s increasing oversight of firms, especially those considering mergers, acquisitions, or private equity investment activity.


Loading animation