Quindell deputy chairman resigns post at Financial Reporting Council


share prices

Code said options should not vest for three years

Jim Sutcliffe, appointed deputy chairman of alternative business structure Quindell earlier this month, has resigned from the board of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC).

Mr Sutcliffe, who was chair of the FRC’s codes and standards committee, was given 10.9m share options in Quindell when he accepted the posts of deputy chairman and strategy director earlier this month.

The FRC’s corporate governance code states, in a schedule on remuneration of directors: “In normal circumstances, shares granted or other forms of deferred remuneration should not vest or be paid, and options should not be exercisable, in less than three years. Longer periods may be appropriate.”

Mr Sutcliffe’s options vest on different dates – all of them within a year.

Until now, corporate governance concerns at the AIM-listed company had centred on new non-executive chairman Richard Rose, who received over 8m in share options.

Under the Quoted Companies Alliance (QCA) corporate governance code, which applies to AIM-listed companies, non-executive directors “do not normally participate in performance-related remuneration or have a significant participation in a company share option scheme”.

The code said that on the rare occasion where performance-related remuneration was under consideration, “shareholders must be consulted and their support obtained.”

Like Mr Sutcliffe, the 8.7m options awarded to Mr Rose vest at various stages over the next year.

Announcing the departure of Mr Sutcliffe, FRC chairman Sir Win Bischoff thanked him for his commitment and service to the board and his “effective leadership of the codes and standards committee and before that the board for actuarial standards of the FRC.”

On its website, Quindell said its directors recognised the importance of sound corporate governance and “have regard to the corporate governance guidelines for AIM companies published by the QCA”.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

20 September 2018
Simon McCrum

Why don’t lawyers do what you ask them to do?

Having been team leader, department head, division head and managing partner, I understand well the frustration (and anger) that managing partners and CEOs voice to me: “We’ve asked them a dozen times, but still they aren’t doing what we need!”

Read More