QS defends "premature" attack ads and reports mixed results from WH Smith stands

Print This Post

22 November 2012

Arif: QS now by some distance the most well-known legal brand in the market

QualitySolicitors (QS) has admitted its campaign of attack ads on ‘faceless’ legal advice may have been premature, but defended it on the grounds that the network’s solicitors wanted the message publicised.

Speaking at the Legal Futures conference in London, QS’s chief operating officer, Saleem Arif, also said the company’s tie-up with WH Smith had yielded “mixed” results and that its national TV advertising campaign had made QS by far the best-known legal brand in the marketplace. He pledged to maintain the momentum in 2013.

Asked whether the attack ads – launched last month to differentiate QS’s network of traditional high street law firms from consumer businesses entering the market – were premature on the grounds that the public are not aware that banks and supermarkets could offer legal advice, Mr Arif conceded: “It is true that it’s possibly slightly early.”

But he insisted the campaign had raised an issue “which we felt was becoming more and more important to local solicitors”. His members had wanted to see QS underlining that legal services consumers “want somebody they can meet face-to-face; not everyone wants the cheapest possible deal or wants to deal with their legal issue through a call centre – they want somebody who they know and trust and who can empathise with their particular issue”.

He continued: “I think the campaign achieved that… it was something that we felt would become more and more apparent to people with every new non-legal entrant coming into the market.”

Mr Arif said the deal to place legal access points (LAPs) in WH Smith stores had been a “mixed bag”, adding: “In a majority of cases I think it has worked well where firms are getting a lot more traction in terms of creating awareness for themselves, generating appointments.

“However, certainly as far as LAPs are concerned it’s very much dependent on the person that you have in the store; whether you have somebody who is engaging and confident or whether you have somebody who doesn’t speak to anyone.”

He said QS’s October 2011 with Palamon Capital Partners had enabled the TV advertising campaign which had made QS “now by some distance the most well-known legal brand in the market”. Next year the company would seize “the opportunity to really grow that branding and that marketing exponentially”.

The Team Saatchi-designed campaign, launched in May, had produced some “very impressive results”, said Mr Arif. The TV ad was viewed by more than 2m people on YouTube, which was “unheard of for legal services” and the soundtrack “managed to make the iTunes top 40”. The advert was “one of the most talked about this year on social media”.

The Palamon deal had brought to QS valuable expertise in professional services, as well as the funding “to spend whatever is necessary to make QualitySolicitors the dominant player for legal services in the UK”.

He highlighted the experience derived from Palamon’s investment in Integrated Dental Holdings, a group of hundreds of independent dentists’ practices. The investor had “used economies of scale to slash costs and… centralise a lot of those back-office functions, making those dental practices considerably more profitable than they were before”. He indicated that a similar approach is likely at QS.

A spin-off benefit of the investment was that the network’s member firms “are looking at us very differently”, said Mr Arif. “I think it’s given firms a lot more confidence that we’re able to compete… and it’s having a real knock-on effect in terms of the types of firms that are expressing interest in coming on board.”

He claimed that firms that were market-leaders in their towns and were “not unsuccessful or struggling in any way” were approaching QS because “they realise that there are huge advantages to combining forces with other firms in other areas of the country to enable them to grow and to dominate their local market”.


One Response to “QS defends "premature" attack ads and reports mixed results from WH Smith stands”

  1. Whilst not yet hugely impressed by QS (I am not a member), I am very impressed by their management and capital financing set up. If they get things right they will do very well–I suspect their weakness is that their members are lawyers…….

    That said, I’d be very surprised indeed if QS was indeed the most recognised legal brand–I think the Law Society would be way out ahead.

    It is by no means unheard for me to criticise the Society but that brand is worth a lot and QS risks confusing people into thinking their lawyers don’t have that as well.

    I’ve always thought that the best brand is more to do with how you treat people rather than by advertising your name.

  2. Andrew Woolley on November 26th, 2012 at 12:17 pm

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018