‘QS Price Promise’ to launch in September


Eddie Ross

Ross: discussions with “significant number of firms” about signing up

QualitySolicitors is to launch its ‘QS Price Promise’ in September, combined with a national TV advertising campaign, the network has revealed.

The concept, announced by QS founder Craig Holt in December, has been piloted in two phases since August last year.

Eddie Ross, chief executive of QS since the start of this year, said the promise would not mean, as originally envisaged, that hourly rates would be dropped completely.

“We will outline extremely clearly what things are going to cost and why,” Mr Ross said. “We will offer customers a fixed fee, but will explain in some cases why it might not be the best idea and let them decide.”

Mr Ross said the price promise “must be embraced by firms” for it to mean something to customers. “Of course, people like things to be cheaper, but the main problem for them is lack of understanding.”

Mr Ross said he could understand why the QS 2012 TV campaign ‘For whatever life brings’ was popular with lawyers, but he wanted the latest adverts to be “about pinpointing customers and bringing them in”.

In a departure from previous comments from QS, which suggested that local law firm brands could eventually disappear in favour of a single QS brand, Mr Ross said this would be “contrary to my strategy and belief”.

Instead he said that firms that joined QS network would not in their first year have to feature QS in their firm name at all.

Mr Ross said QS currently had 100 firms in 200 locations, down from 120 firms in December last year.

However, he said QS was holding discussions with a “significant number of firms” about signing up, and he was hoping for 30 to 35 more to have joined the network by the end of the year.

Mr Ross said QS had been on a “bit of a journey”. He went on: “The fundamental idea has not changed – “let’s create a brand that consumers recognise” and delivers a better offering.

“What has changed dramatically is the way we’re executing this. We need to be clear about what we do and don’t do and careful not to make any great claims or say we have the answer. To a great extent it’s about each law firm realising that it is a business.

“The strength of QS is in our firms, not some kind of magical central organisation. The firms are the ones that have to provide a fantastic service. Our hope is to help them.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Jenny Dobson says:

    Oh dear a concept that you have to change on the ‘fly’ seems like the classic death by a thousand cuts! Poor buggers.

  • Paul Careless says:

    It seems to me that QS have scaled prematurely. Im not sure that QS had really found their product/market fit prior to raising an inordinate amount of cash. Pivoting to new models with a lot of cash is tough for a number of reasons, not least the pressure from the investors. Innovation is best dealt with on as little resource as possible ensuring that pride doesn’t get in the way of getting it right.

  • On the contrary Jenny. For some strange reason in this country we seem to think changing your mind is a bad thing, especially in those in the public eye. I’d say it’s more a position of strength, to show you’ve listened to what other stakeholders are saying. It sounds to me as if QS are pitching it just right to the consumer, but we will just have to wait and see.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Embracing the future: Navigating AI in litigation

Whilst the UK courts have shown resistance to change over time, in the past decade they have embraced the use of some technologies that naturally improve efficiency. Now we’re in the age of AI.


A sorry tale of two conveyances

In a first for this website, Mrs Legal Futures has written a blog. All the lawyers have been named after Teletubbies, partly for privacy but mostly for petty revenge.


Combatting discrimination caused by algorithms requires a uniform approach

As we see more and more decision-making responsibilities once entrusted solely to humans now delegated to automated systems, we are also observing a rise in algorithmic discrimination.


Loading animation