QC forms his own law firm to “modernise access to barrister services”

Fisher: no desire to compete with solicitors

Fisher: no desire to compete with solicitors

A leading white collar crime barrister said this week that he may conduct straightforward litigation through his new Bar Standards Board-authorised entity.

Bright Line Law, launched this week, is the brainchild of Jonathan Fisher QC and was devised in part as an attempt to bring together the various strands of his financial crime and proceeds of crime practice, plus academic teaching and training, the barrister said.

“Practicing as a barrister through a corporate entity is the perfect way forward for a leading practitioner with a strong reputation in a niche area, such as financial crime,” he said.

“It enables solicitors, accountants and other clients to access barrister services in a modern and commercially sensitive environment. I am watching the BSB’s approach to the introduction of multi-disciplinary practices this autumn with great interest and the possible implications for white collar crime practitioners.”

The barrister has left Devereux Chambers and has taken an associate tenancy at Red Lion Chambers, where he was a pupil, for those clients who want a ‘traditional’ relationship with him.

Asked whether he would take advantage of his new-found ability to conduct litigation, Mr Fisher said he did not have any intention to compete for work with solicitors but said it would depend on the case.

He said: “I can envisage a case, for example something that goes into the [tribunal], let’s say a money laundering case or a tax case, where I would be prepared to conduct the litigation myself.

“But it’s really got to be a case… where there was not disclosure of documents, that sort of thing. I know that I’m licensed to do it but common sense tells me that I’m really trained and good at being a barrister and not a solicitor.”

He said the application for an entity went “incredibly smoothly”. He was “very impressed” with the BSB, which was “really helpful” in assisting applicants to meet their regulatory requirements.

He continued: “Actually when you look at what they are trying to do, it seems to me pretty sensible, given that they are now licensing barristers to do litigation. I mean, it’s pregnant with disaster… So I got in the frame of mind of thinking ‘well, actually, if I was in their position I’d be doing the same thing’.”

He said Bright Line, which is based in London and Manchester, would “bring together various facets of my professional life, my advisory work, my teaching, my lecturing, my training, some consultancy work. It’s all under one roof which is actually quite neat.”

He is a visiting professor at the London School of Economics, where he teaches modules on corporate crime, financial crime, and international economic sanctions.

According to Mr Fisher, Bright Line refers to the ‘bright line rule’, which is “a simple objective standard, based on the principles of thorough examination and integrity, which is applied in every case to resolve ambiguities”.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.


16 November 2018

Transparency is about a lot more than just price

The transparency agenda is much more than the figures you put on your website; it all comes back to communication, the root of so many lawyers’ problems if you look at the types of complaint that go to the Legal Ombudsman.

Read More