QASA challenge on its last legs

Print This Post

28 March 2014

Court of Appeal: claimants have one last shot

The legal challenge to the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) is nearly at an end after the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal the High Court decision that rejected it.

The four claimants challenging the Legal Services Board’s approval of QASA now have until next Wednesday to request an oral hearing of the application for permission.

In February, the permission to appeal its dismissal of the judicial review, saying there was no reasonable prospect of a successful challenge, and so the claimants applied directly.

In coming to the same decision, Lord Justice Laws said that many of the issues in the case were matters of judgement rather than law, “and the Divisional Court’s reasoning is nuanced, balanced and very careful”.

He continued: “Despite counsel’s comprehensive and elegant skeleton (which in some respects seeks to build legal points out of matters of judgement), in my view it betrays no arguable error of law.

“In particular, the Divisional Court’s approach to irrationality and proportionality (and the application of proportionality if, contrary to their view, it applied) is in my judgment plainly correct.”

Laws LJ rejected the suggestion that the controversial and sensitive nature of the case was in itself a compelling reason for it to be revisited by the Court of Appeal, saying “it has been so fully and fairly dealt with below that I have concluded that this is not required”.

He was also unmoved by the bid to appeal the £150,000 costs order, which was the maximum under the protective costs order that had earlier been imposed. “The costs order, which was of course consonant with the PCO, was within the generous ambit of discretion enjoyed by the court below,” the judge said.

Earlier this week, Legal Futures reported that just 100 solicitors and barristers had so far registered for QASA; those practising on the Midlands and Western Circuits have until 30 May to do so.

Tags: ,

2 Responses to “QASA challenge on its last legs”

  1. If this is the end of the road for the JR challenge, so be it, but it is not the end of opposition to QASA. Just because it’s not unlawful does not make it a good scheme.

    The CBA said in October 2012 that it was a sham scheme, intended to perpetrate a fraud on the public by giving a cloak of respectability to bad advocacy, and that it would resist it by all lawful means.

    Not signing up is perfectly lawful. It is each person’s choice. If enough of us choose not to sign up, the BSB will not dare to ‘lock us out’ of criminal advocacy and close the Crown Courts. The Bar must not permit the BSB to divide and rule us by implementing the scheme in stages. If practitioners on the Midland and Western Circuits have the courage to refuse to sign up, the rest of us must support them by not just scabbing their work, but by downing tools with them on 3rd June. This is an issue for the whole criminal Bar (and next, the Family Bar, and next…) and we must fight it together.

  2. Ian West on March 28th, 2014 at 9:17 am
  3. “Lower your shields and surrender … Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile”

  4. David Tyne on March 28th, 2014 at 5:40 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Why your firm should support working mothers to the hilt

Georgina Hamblin

If you are going to balance the demands of work and childcare, and stay sane, you need to adapt, and with any luck your firm will adapt with you. In doing so you will both win, and your respective productivity will soar. When I had my son, I realised just how lucky I was. Not only did I have the incredible support of my, and my husband’s, family through this life-changing time, but I had a firm that offered me complete flexibility and control over my return to business life.

April 19th, 2018