Pupil sanctioned for passing off other people’s work as his own

Pupil: Must complete six more months

A pupil barrister who passed off other people’s work as his own and lied about it to the head of his chambers’ pupillage committee has been told he cannot qualify for at least three years.

A Bar disciplinary tribunal ruled last week that the Bar Standards Board should not issue a practising certificate to Mr P*, who was called in October 2020, before 14 December 2025.

Further, he has to complete a further six months of pupillage before any practising certificate can be issued, such pupillage not to start within two years of the same date.

The full tribunal decision has yet to be published, but the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service said that, on 12 May 2021, Mr P submitted to a member of chambers as his own work a skeleton argument as part of his practice advocacy exercise, when in fact he had taken it from a skeleton that the same barrister had submitted in 2018 as part of his own exercise.

Mr P had obtained it by searching the emails of the head of the pupillage committee, without either the head or the author’s knowledge or consent.

Then, on 19 May, he submitted as his own a draft opinion to a member of chambers, again “for the purposes of assessing his capability within pupillage”, when he knew he had taken it from the work of that barrister and of a pupil, which he had taken from the barrister’s room without her knowledge or consent.

On 1 June, he repeated the misconduct with a draft letter responding to a letter of claim.

According to BTAS, three days later in a meeting with the head of the pupillage committee, Mr P falsely said that he had not seen the draft letter before writing his own.

Mr P was also ordered to pay costs of £1,800. The decision is currently open to appeal.

* In light of the full decision, when it was subsequently published, we have decided to redact Mr P’s name.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Legal project management – a mindset lawyers can easily apply

Where budgets are tight, lawyers will be considering what’s in their existing arsenal to still improve productivity. One effective, accessible and cheap tool is legal project management.

How a good customer journey can put your business on the map

Good customer service should be a priority for any business and, if you want to stay ahead of the competition, something that’s constantly under review.

The CAT’s welcome boost for the funding industry

There was welcome guidance from the Competition Appeal Tribunal this week for funded cases looking for certainty following PACCAR, with the renegotiated Sony litigation funding agreement upheld as lawful.

Loading animation