Profits up but turnover down for NAH as Underdog faces being sent to his kennel


Underdog: has he had his day?

NAHL plc – the legal marketing business that owns National Accident Helpline (NAH) – has reported a 15% increase in profits despite a small fall in turnover in 2016 that would have been significantly larger had the non-personal injury (PI) elements of its business not performed well.

It has also emerged that NAH’s ‘Underdog’ character is to be put on a short leash as the company revamps its advertising.

The group’s revenue declined 2.6% to £49.4m, but operating profit rose 15% to £18m, meaning its profit margin increased from 30.8% to 36.4%.

NAHL has flagged for some time a different approach to personal injury (PI), targeting a lower number of higher-quality leads for panel firms, and also revealed last week that joint venture alternative business structures would be part of its response to the government’s proposed PI reforms.

As a result, the PI division’s revenue in 2016 was a third to £30m, with profit down 9% to £14.1m, but strong performances from its critical care division – providing rehabilitation services – its particularly its residential conveyancing division (revenue up 156% to £9m) balanced these..

CEO Russell Atkinson told Legal Futures that the group had spent less on advertising in 2016 – reducing its TV exposure and focusing its pay per click activities – but with it putting aside £1m to relaunch its brand in 2017, he said it would be returning to television.

“Reinvigorating our brand” would mean that the Underdog character would have a “much smaller role in the future, but we won’t be putting him down”, said Mr Atkinson.

He described the PI division’s trading performance as “resilient”, adding: “We have a clear strategy in place to develop our business model while our proven track record of responding to regulatory change and underlying brand strength leaves the PI division well positioned to succeed in the new landscape.”

But Mr Atkinson indicated there were no plans at the moment to diversify further than NAHL already had.

Tags:




Blog


Why law firms are getting AI supervision wrong

The profession’s response to AI supervision failures misunderstands the nature of LLM output – there needs to be for a shift in the culture.


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Loading animation