Profits soar as listed legal business benefits from litigation investment


Foulston: Building one of London’s premier mid-tier law firms

RBG Holdings, the AIM-listed company that now owns two law firms, saw profits increase nearly three-fold in the first six months of the year, fuelled by gains from its litigation work.

Group revenue rose 53% from £12m to £18.3m in the year to 30 June, with £1.5m of this attributed to gains on litigation assets.

Underlying revenues – excluding Memery Crystal, whose acquisition contributed to only the last month of the period – were up 35% to £16.2m. Group profit before tax leapt 279% to £3.9m.

Convex Capital, the group’s specialist sell-side M&A boutique, completed eight deals resulting in £5m of revenue – it made a negligible contribution in the same period last year.

Net debt was £9.8m, compared to just £1.6m a year earlier, reflecting the company’s new £10m term facility. Total lock-up was 102 days, down from 114.

RBG bought Memery Crystal for £30m and it brought average revenue per fee earner down from £497,000 to £375,000.

Group chief executive Nicola Foulston explained: “This change reflects the diversification of the legal services business into more non-contentious areas of law, following the acquisition of Memery Crystal, which are less profitable due to fixed fees and prior to the benefits of the integration.

“However, this provides a natural hedge to the Group’s dispute resolution activities which, while more profitable, are more contingent.”

Rosenblatt has taken on five cases on a contingent basis, with contingent WIP of £5.8m and total cash investment of £4.9m.

Litigation funding arm LionFish Litigation Finance recorded £500,000 in gains on litigation assets and generated £800,000 by selling participation rights in its invested cases.

It has now committed £8m to 10 litigation cases over the next three years, of which £3.2m has been drawn down, having received 393 enquiries since launch. A further 54 are under consideration while the remaining 329 have been rejected

Ms Foulston said: “Our diversified revenue model is proving incredibly resilient, despite uncertain times, and we are building a strong platform from which to drive future growth.

“Our legal services business, strengthened by the acquisition of Memery Crystal, continues to receive a high volume of new client instructions.

“Since the lifting of lockdown our legal services and M&A businesses have seen strong growth in M&A and capital markets activity… We are building one of London’s premier mid-tier law firms providing quality advice to entrepreneurs and high net-worth individuals.”

As at 30 June, the combined businesses had 212 people, including 139 fee-earners.

Dispute resolution generates 53% of legal revenues, with corporate at 22% and real estate 19%.

Ms Foulston said the group remained on the look-out for further acquisitions “to build and diversify the business to create long-term shareholder value”.

RBG’s share price jumped 8% in early trading on the back of the results to 139p. This summer the share price has reached new heights, going as high as 160p in June.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Automated justice: striking the balance in injury claims

No professional sector is immune from automation – even the law. However, the adoption of automated systems to settle routine injury claims raises a number of important ethical questions.


Conveyancers: are you afraid of outsourcing?

For many years, outsourcing has been seen as a bit of a scary prospect within the conveyancing sector. But thanks to the stamp duty holiday, conveyancers are now realising some of the many benefits.


You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?


Loading animation