Profession claims victory in fight against extended court hours

Wibberley: Working group chair

The legal profession claimed victory last night in the fight against extended operating hours (EOH) in the criminal courts.

The move by HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has been bitterly opposed by barristers and solicitors alike, amid wellbeing concerns and also that advocates unable to cover EOH – likely to be disproportionately women – would lose work and could be driven out of the profession as a result.

Some 55% barristers said in a survey last summer that they would consider leaving the Bar if the courts adopted EOH.

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) tweeted yesterday: “We have spent months campaigning, writing reports & instructing @Mishcon_de_Reya to protect our members and the Bar from the discriminatory project to introduce Extended Court Operating Hours. We are pleased that @MoJGovUK has taken the decision not proceed with the scheme.

“To be clear, it will not be proceeded with in the foreseeable future. We consider it will not raise its head again.”

However, the Ministry of Justice was not prepared to confirm any of this when contacted by Legal Futures last night.

HMCTS ran pilots at seven courts in the autumn that saw have two separate morning and afternoon sessions of 9am to 1pm and 2pm to 6pm. Another courtroom operated on standard hours.

It planned to roll the model out to 65 Crown Courts last month in a bid to reduce the backlog of cases – which was already huge before Covid – that has grown further during the pandemic.

The CBA praised the “fantastic work” of barrister Lucie Wibberley and the court capacity working group she chaired, and said it was “forever grateful” to London law firm Mishcon de Reya for its pro bono assistance.

Ms Wibberley, who practises from Garden Court Chambers, said there had been “fantastic team work” on the group between barristers and solicitors Zachery White of Montague Solicitors and the Legal Sectors Workers Union, Hussain Hassan of Lawton Solicitors and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley.

“We said no to EOH. We say yes to safe spacious courts and testing. Fighting for Safe Justice for all our communities,” she added.

The group Women in Criminal Law, which played a central role in the campaign, celebrated the decision but said the work was not over.

It tweeted: “Our Magistrates’ Court Working Party is keen to make sure that the abandonment of EOH in the Crown Court doesn’t distract us from stealth EOH in the Mags.”

The author, the Secret Barrister, tweeted: “Fantastic news. Proof that showing strength in the face of governmental bullying yields results. The justice system will be fixed by proper funding – not by forcing legal professionals to give up what remains of our family lives.”

The CBA also announced that HMCTS has confirmed “hard plans” to introduce 16 further criminal Nightingale courts – only nine of the 21 current Nightingale courts handle criminal work – while the lateral flow testing pilot at Manchester Civil Justice Centre would be expanded to major court centres.

Further, a court complaints procedure and escalation procedure for court safety issues were both now in place.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Conveyancers: are you afraid of outsourcing?

For many years, outsourcing has been seen as a bit of a scary prospect within the conveyancing sector. But thanks to the stamp duty holiday, conveyancers are now realising some of the many benefits.

You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?

Clinical negligence, a changing market – part 1

The consolidation of law firms through merger and acquisition has resulted in fewer, but more sophisticated and expert clinical negligence practices.

Loading animation