Platform brings AI to pricing legal work


Burcher: Market pressures require pricing efficiency

A legal costs and pricing specialist has designed artificial intelligence-powered (AI) software that it says will help law firms price work faster and more accurately.

By inputting a project’s parameters into the cloud-based product – known as Virtual Pricing Director, created by costs consultancy Burcher Jennings and its pricing arm Validatum –  the firm can generate “relevant assumptions and exclusions” and produce a “price risk profile” and recommended fees, its makers claimed.

The product is the brainchild of pricing expert Richard Burcher.

Publicity material said: “The platform will offer intelligent templates that incorporate an array of practice areas, tasks, rates and clauses, and produces an automated pricing dashboard that presents clients and law firms with a clear breakdown of expected spending…

“The platform also helps law firms meet compliance requirements under the new transparency regulations coming into effect in December.”

The software was built using Neota Logic’s ‘drag and drop’ AI engine, which enables legal services professionals to create sophisticated technology applications.

Describing the product, Neota’s managing director, Europe, Rick Seabrook, said: “Virtual Pricing Director will give users a complete pricing summary, outlining not only the fees options but also an explanation of how they are calculated, making it easy for the client to select the right option for them.

“One more click and it will be automatically emailed to the client, and put on your client file.

“All of this takes you somewhere between three to five minutes depending upon how complex the matter might be. ”

Mr Burcher said: “Market pressures and regulatory requirements are fuelling an inevitable drive towards greater price efficiency across the legal sector.

“Given rising client expectations and the step-changes in the business side of law in recent years, it is extraordinary that the prevalent pricing methodologies continue to range from ‘gut feel’ estimates, to complex, time-consuming yet opaque deconstructions of every element within a legal matter.”

Separately, a substantial number of in-house counsel can point to technology they have deployed which is hardly used and gathering dust, LexisNexis UK has said in a survey.

The information and analytics provider consulted some 150 in-house lawyers about their technology use and found that while most had introduced various technologies to their departments and almost two-thirds were confident it would enhance legal work in future, more than a third were ignorant of what IT their law firms were using.

This was important, because almost half were expecting the firms to advise on the best technology.

Further, one in five general counsel could point to recently-installed technology which had little or no use, increasing their dependency on good advice.

Sophie Gould, Lexis’s head of in-house, said: “The in-house role has changed significantly, and beyond being ‘a good lawyer’ general counsel now need to drive efficiencies, add real value and demonstrate commercial acumen…

“[They] need to maximise the value from their legal service providers so it is imperative that they have a clear understanding of the technology used by their law firms, and how this can benefit them.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

10 December 2018
Barbara Hamilton-Bruce LF conf 2018

People change, people deliver

I’ve been in the midst of change for most of my career. Change was the unintended consequence of getting into PI. Change became intentional when I stepped into a senior operational role.

Read More