Planning consultancy targets referrals with ABS


Cridland: smaller firms reluctant to refer to larger rivals

A planning consultancy has created an alternative business structure (ABS) to handle the legal work associated with planning applications, hoping to capitalise on fears of small law firms that they might lose clients referred to larger firms.

Origin 3 Legal, which received its ABS licence from the Solicitors Regulation Authority on 20 January, is owned by its head of legal practice, solicitor Graham Cridland, and two directors of Origin 3, an established planning and urban design consultancy in Bristol.

Mr Cridland will work in both bodies, depending whether the legal work is regulated or non-regulated. Regulated aspects of Origin 3’s work consists mainly of certain agreements which are deeds.

Mr Cridland was until November 2019 a partner and head of planning at the Exeter office of south-west law firm Ashfords.

He told Legal Futures that the ABS would target smaller law firms without specialist planning law capabilities, which he believed “prefer to refer to a bespoke planning service that isn’t a larger law firm rival”.

It would also attempt to attract clients consulting with the ABS directly. If the business grew as planned, the ABS would take on more lawyers in due course.

He added that consulting early on in planning applications could pay dividends: “If we are in at the start, then what tends to happen with planning [is] when applications are being considered, hopefully there will be more work to follow and we have a really good understanding about what the client’s application is.

“We can have input into what some of the terms may be in the agreement and be able to deal with those at an early stage, as opposed to possibly unpicking them at a later stage when we are instructed at a later date.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation