Personal injury firms escape indemnity renewal relatively unscathed, survey finds


Wallis: insurers continuing to support PI firms

The vast majority of personal injury law firms appear to have renewed their indemnity insurance on acceptable terms despite the instability in the sector, according to a survey of nearly 500 law firms conducted last week.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority revealed last week that 185 firms had failed to secure insurance by the 1 October deadline, but the poll by Liverpool practice O’Connors – which advises other law firms – found that not one of the PI firms surveyed was among them.

The firm said comments like “we started the process in June but only renewed on the very last day” and “there must be a better way than this” reflected the general anxiety and frustrations of many respondents.

Some 87% of those surveyed went with a rated insurer, leaving 13% to unrated insurers. The length of indemnity period varied from 12 months (78%) to 18 months (14%) and 24 months (8%). Those who opted for 18 months appear to be taking advantage of the new rule which allows solicitors to renew at any time of the year.

Changes in premium levels were also mixed. Some 16% said their premiums went up a lot, while 14% saw a significant fall. Most said premiums were broadly in line with last year.

The majority (55%) reported excess levels staying the same as last year, though 11% reported increases in both individual and aggregate levels and 11% reporting decreases.

Four in ten firms took out a management liability policy, similar to directors and officers cover, with 50% choosing not to do so.

O’Connors partner Nigel Wallis said: “Given the increasing COLP and COFA liabilities, the insurance industry would do well to increase awareness of this, particularly amongst the 11% who said they’d never heard of it.”

The service provided by the broker community was considered mixed, with 64% describing it as ‘first class’, 22% as ‘second class’ and 14% as ‘cattle class’.

Four of every five firms said premiums were less that 5% of turnover; the rest paid between 5% and 10%. One solicitor said he was “off to re-train as a plumber”.

Mr Wallis said: “Whilst there are reports of several hundred firms taking advantage of the extended indemnity period, the results of our survey suggest that things are not perhaps as bleak for the majority

“The insurance industry remains nervous of the financial stability of many firms but, on this evidence at least, the industry continues to step up to the plate and support the sector, albeit with some hardening rates and tightening terms.”

London and Slough firm Harris Cartier, which had a significant clinical negligence practice, was sold off last Friday after failing to find the finance to pay its insurance premium.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Sadly, Harris Cartier also includes serious injury personal injury as well as clinical negligence. In this instance, the firm falls out of the findings of the survey.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Loading animation