Partner fined for using firm’s accounts as bank


SRA: Own fining powers sufficient

A partner who used his law firm’s office and client accounts as personal banking facilities has been fined £2,000 by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Iqbal Singh Sekhon, at the time a partner at Bradford firm Sekhon & Firth, received the maximum fine the SRA can issue without sending him to a disciplinary tribunal after the pair reached a regulatory settlement agreement.

Mr Sekhon, who qualified in 1999, had a third party pay £400,000 into the firm’s office account back in 2009. The money was “in partial satisfaction of a liability owed” by ‘Person A’ to the solicitor.

Neither the third party nor Person A were clients of the firm at the time of, or in relation, to the payment, and Mr Sekhon admitted that the liability was “in respect of matters which did not form the basis of the solicitor/client relationship or instruction”.

Mr Sekhon then transferred the money into the firm’s client account and made smaller payments out from it to settle his own personal liabilities

The solicitor admitted paying money into client account without any instructions or underlying transaction, in breach of the accounts rules.

The SRA said the maximum financial penalty was “the appropriate outcome” because Mr Sekhon was no longer practising as a partner with control of a client account, he co-operated with the SRA’s investigation, and the breach was serious but “protection of the public/public interest in this case does not require a greater sanction than the SRA is able to impose”.

Mr Sekhon will also pay SRA costs of £12,450.

In another regulatory settlement agreement, the SRA has rebuked Rhiannon Jade Compton, a solicitor at north Wales firm Bennett Smith, after she pleaded guilty to drink-driving.

A court disqualified her from driving for a year and fined her £280.




Blog


When AI becomes a line on the client’s bill

On 23 June, Legora changed how it charges. The platform announced that its most capable product was moving away from a flat per-seat licence fee to consumption-based pricing


Which legal AI will still matter in 12 months?

Four years ago, when senior partners asked me which legal AI they should buy, I would have walked them through a vendor comparison. Now I tell them the question is wrong.


Supreme Court redraws line between member and employee in LLPs

For anyone advising professional services firms on LLP structuring, and of course for those in LLPs themselves, last week’s Supreme Court ruling is an essential read.


Loading animation