Partner fined after charitable trusts used client account as bank

SRA: Sanction necessary

A charity law specialist who allowed two charitable trusts to use his firm’s client account as a banking facility has been fined £2,000 by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Jonathan Brinsden, a partner at BDB Pitmans, accepted the fine in a regulatory settlement agreement that means he will not have to face a disciplinary tribunal.

The conduct happened while he was in practice at Bircham Dyson Bell, prior to its 2018 merger with Pitmans Law.

The agreement said he offered the use of the firm’s client account to conduct transactions for two charitable trusts while waiting for the clients’ bank accounts to be opened.

The amounts paid through the client account were $118,000 for one client and $280,000 for the other.

Mr Brinsden accepted that this was in breach of ban on providing banking facilities through a client account as there was no underlying legal transaction and it did not form part of the usual work of solicitors. In doing so, he damaged trust in the profession.

In mitigation, he said it was an isolated incident and that “on reflection he made a mistake, which he did purely out of convenience for the clients, owing to delays in establishing bank accounts for the clients”.

The SRA said the agreed outcome was a proportionate outcome in the public interest “because the issuing of such a sanction is necessary to maintain standards by highlighting the risks arising from the behaviour in question and deterring such repetition”.

But there was no evidence of lasting harm to consumers or third parties and “a low risk of repetition”.

Further, at the time, Mr Brinsden understood that the transactions fell outside the ban “as they were part of his acting for charitable clients in connection with ‘traditional work undertaken by solicitors’. As such his actions were neither deliberate nor reckless”.

He also agreed to pay costs of £1,350.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.

Loading animation