Parliament to debate call to extend SDLT holiday extension


Norman: Putting the government’s side during debate

MPs will next week debate a petition signed by over 130,000 people calling for a six-month extension to the stamp duty land tax holiday, which is due to end on 31 March.

It comes as research says that 39% of buyers plan to pull out of their transaction if they miss the deadline.

The government has been resisting growing pressure to extend the holiday despite warnings from conveyancers, estate agents and others for two months now that the weight of transactions was slowing down the process, such as obtaining local authority searches.

Jonathan Steel began the petition on Parliament’s e-petitions website last November, arguing that an extension would help “stabilise” the housing market.

“Many buyers who are looking to move to a property that they will not be able to afford otherwise…

“I am looking to move into a new build which is currently due to complete at the start of March 2021. If this build is delayed past 31 March 2021, then I will not be able to afford the stamp duty so will not be able to afford the house.”

As the signatories have topped 100,000, it became eligible for debate in Parliament and its petitions committee has announced that it will do so on Monday. Jesse Norman, financial secretary to the Treasury, will respond for the government.

In its response to the petition, HM Treasury said the holiday was announced last June “to stimulate immediate momentum in the property market and to support the jobs of people whose employment relied on custom from the property industry”.

Since the relief was introduced, transactions have increased and seasonally adjusted data showed that transactions in October 2020 were 8% higher than a year earlier.

“As the relief was to provide an immediate stimulus to the property market, the government does not plan to extend this relief. SDLT is an important source of government revenue, raising several billion pounds each year to help pay for the essential services the government provides.”

SDLT relief for first-time buyers will remain, it added, while a new Help to Buy scheme will be introduced from 1 April 2021 for two years.

A survey of 3,717 people by homebuying platform Yes Homebuyers found that the delays are hitting buyers hard: a third have had to make alternative living arrangements, while a quarter have seen their sale fall through.

Just over a third (35%) have had to increase their offer to keep the seller from pulling out.

Some 39% said they would cancel their purchase if they missed the deadline, while a further 27% said they would have to borrow more money to pay for the extra stamp duty.

Despite remaining largely hopeful about completing in time, 45% of those asked said they would pay the full stamp duty if it meant they could complete now.

Matthew Cooper, founder and managing director of Yes Homebuyers, said: “As with most poorly thought-out government rescue plans, the stamp duty holiday has done an outstanding job of fuelling demand, while completely neglecting how the market will actually deal with such an uplift.

“Although the idea of a stamp duty saving would have been a tantalising one, many buyers are now finding themselves stuck in market limbo, facing more stress, long delays, temporary living arrangements, or having to place a higher offer. All for a few thousand saved in tax.”

The parliamentary debate takes place from 4.30pm on Monday 1 February. It can be watched here.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Use the tools available to stop doing the work you shouldn’t be doing anyway

We are increasingly taken for granted in the world of Do It Yourself, in which we’re required to do some of the work we have ostensibly paid for, such as in banking, travel and technology


Quality indicators – peer recommendations over review websites

I often feel that I am banging the SRA’s drum for them when it comes to transparency but it’s because I genuinely believe in clarity when it comes to promoting quality professional services.


Embracing the future: Navigating AI in litigation

Whilst the UK courts have shown resistance to change over time, in the past decade they have embraced the use of some technologies that naturally improve efficiency. Now we’re in the age of AI.


Loading animation