Paralegal fabricated email to cover up error


Email: Used to mislead court, counsel and opposing solicitors

A paralegal has been banned from the profession for fabricating an email in a bid to cover up a mistake she made that led to a case being struck out.

Chaida Aboobakar worked on personal injury cases for Cardiff-based New Law Solicitors but at the time was seconded to Ageas Law, a joint venture partner of NewLaw.

According to a notice published by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), one of the cases she was working on was struck out for non-payment of a court fee. Ms Aboobakar thought she had paid it but had put the wrong case number on the payment request.

She tried to cover up the mistake by sending the court a fabricated email purporting to show the correct claim number. This email did not match the original held on the court file.

Ms Aboobaker filed an application for relief against sanction, accompanied by a witness statement exhibiting the fabricated email and blaming court error for the non-payment. She instructed counsel on this basis and made similar representations to solicitors for the other side.

Ms Aboobakar maintained this fiction over a period of four months.

As a result of concerns raised by the judge conducting the relief hearing, NewLaw held an internal investigation which concluded that the email originally sent by Ms Aboobakar containing the incorrect case number was the only one sent.

It was found that Ms Aboobakar had acted dishonestly and without integrity.

As NewLaw is an alternative business structure, the SRA sanctioned her under section 99 of the Legal Services Act 2007, meaning Ms Aboobakar is disqualified from holding any role at a law firm.

She was also directed to pay costs of £600.




Blog


What would a single regulator mean for firms and practitioners?

The Legal Services Consumer Panel has renewed its call for a single regulator to replace the eight approved regulators currently governing legal services.


Why council tenants often wait longest for disrepair to be fixed

Why do council tenants appear to wait longer for disrepair to be resolved, and what does that tell us about the changing relationship between landlords, tenants and accountability?


Alternative dispute resolution comes to credit hire

Following an initial pilot in 2025 that returned encouraging results, phase 2 of the GTA ADR scheme is due to begin in September 2026.


Loading animation