Pandemic has “undermined cohesiveness” of firms, lawyers say


Middleburgh: Paucity of data

Nearly half of lawyers believe that working remotely during the pandemic has damaged the cohesiveness of their firms, a global study has found.

Large majorities said productivity and motivation had stayed the same or improved, while a third of lawyers said IT for remote working was worse than than in the office – almost four times more than thought it was better.

The survey, by law firm consultants Edge International, was based on responses from 927 lawyers or law firm employees in countries across the globe, collected from December last year to February 2021.

Some 30% believed working from home had improved the cohesiveness of their law firm, with 23% saying there had been no impact.

However, 47% said cohesiveness had somewhat or significantly decreased.

Child care was a challenging area, with most (60%) of the 30% of lawyers with children reporting that the situation had impacted detrimentally on their ability to work effectively.

Turning to career progression and promotion, a fifth (20%) of lawyers believed that opportunities for career progression and promotion would deteriorate if they continued to work remotely post-pandemic. This is twice the proportion who believed they would improve.

However, 81% of lawyers said productivity had remained the same or increased during the pandemic and 78% motivation.

This was coupled with support from lawyers for remote working to continue, with 87% wanting to work from home between one and four days a week.

The most popular number of days to work remotely was two (26%).

Most lawyers (58%) experienced significantly or somewhat less disruption when they were working from home.

The findings on mental and physical health and wellbeing were mixed. A majority believed working from home had been good for their physical wellbeing (58%) and mental wellbeing (53%), while 27% said they had experienced a negative impact on their emotional wellbeing.

Negative experiences while working remotely included finding it difficult to concentrate on work (24%), low motivation (21%) and low mood (20%).

More common problems were fewer opportunities to bounce ideas off colleagues (43%) and fewer chances to brainstorm (42%).

Lawyers were split on whether or not their continuing professional development had suffered as a result of the pandemic.

Perhaps because of the high levels of uncertainty during the pandemic, most lawyers reported that loyalty to their law firm had stayed the same (58%) or increased (33%), compared to only 6% who said it had fallen.

Former barrister Jonathan Middleburgh, a consultant at Edge International who led the study, said the idea came to him in December last year because of the “paucity of data” on the impact of remote working specific to the legal sector.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Success in-house – what people don’t tell you about how to get there

TV dramas have made many people think that the legal profession consists of heroes (or villains) in high-flying firms or public prosecution. In reality, nearly a quarter of solicitors work in-house.


The ‘soft landing’ growth strategy for law firms

Increasing demand for ‘hot’ areas of law inspires opportunist law firms to hire more specialists to add to their firepower – the right people at the right time. Yet this is a big ask.


The changing landscape of legal education and online learning

Learning has come a long way since I qualified. There’s a lot more knowledge available about how students learn and how different students learn differently. It’s not one-size-fits-all anymore.


Loading animation