Overcharged by a solicitor? Go to a barrister instead, says new direct access service


The Bar: 89% of public unaware of direct access

Barristers’ bid to persuade consumers to come direct to them for legal advice has stepped up with a new direct access service claiming that more than half of Britons think solicitors overcharge.

Absolute Barrister is the brainchild of husband and wife pair Simon and Katy Gittins, both barristers of eight years’ call, and claims to be able to halve the cost of some legal matters.

Having finished a trial phase, Ms Gittins said “we know there is demand for it”, and the company is now rolling out a public relations and marketing campaign.

She said the idea came from a belief that the high solicitor model is failing because it is “outdated, unwieldy and expensive”.

The ‘Solicitor Satisfaction Barometer’ polled a sample of 1,535 people and found that 54% of Britons – and “a staggering 42% of those working in the legal industry” – think solicitors overcharge. A third have faced time delays in solicitors’ handling of their case, 30% don’t understand their pricing structures and just 8% believe solicitors act quickly in the service they provide.

A fifth felt intimidated by the process and uncomfortable asking about charges, with one in eight admitting that when they used a solicitor, they were unsure what the solicitor did for their fees.

Overall, the company said, “the barometer reveals a concern across the UK with the solicitor model of legal advice. Almost one in 10 (9%) people said they didn’t trust the solicitor like they expected to and felt they hid things from them, didn’t understand the advice they were given, or thought they were trying to confuse them with legal jargon.”

The vast majority, however, were unaware that they could go directly to a barrister. “It is astonishing that 89% of people are unaware that going straight to a barrister is even an option,” said Ms Gittins. “Absolute Barrister aims to debunk the myths surrounding barristers and to make the whole process completely transparent.”

Users of the service pay both the barrister’s fixed fee and an administration fee to Absolute Barristers; barristers do not have to pay the company “so as not to create the impression of conflicting loyalties”, Ms Gittins explained. There are currently around 40 barristers on the panel, which will grow in line with demand.

Using a divorce settlement with a contested financial element as an example, she said an Absolute Barrister client could expect to pay £7,200, whereas the average when using a solicitor is £13,300.

The case is mainly conducted through an online portal and instant messaging; though Absolute Barrister will handle some of the administrative work, users will be expected to have a role too. Ms Gittins said: “It’s been surprising how willing people are to do some of the steps themselves.”

“We provide direct access to the foremost legal experts – barristers. Our approach dramatically cuts the costs and time involved in legal proceedings for clients. Fees are agreed up front so our clients know exactly where they stand and there are never any nasty surprises. Gone are the days of worrying over the cost of receiving a letter, a telephone call or photocopies.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Michael says:

    “Using a divorce settlement with a contested financial element as an example, she said an Absolute Barrister client could expect to pay £7,200, whereas the average when using a solicitor is £13,300.”

    With the greatest of respect, this is complete cobblers. I don’t know where they got their figures from, but the average financial settlement for ordinary people out in the sticks costs not only less than the figure of £13,300 quoted but less than the £7,200 figure.

    And how many barristers would be willing to put up with the type of client that divorce lawyers have to deal with constantly, ringing several times a day,and turning up unannounced just to have a moan about the unfairness of life and the iniquity of the justice system.

    I think they will be in for a serious culture shock.

  • Hey, what a great, novel and innovative idea that has never, ever been tried before!

    Instead of focusing on delivering great value, service, advice and support, let’s compete on price. That seems to have worked really well for others.

    But wait, there’s more…I can deliver great value, service, advice and support for half the price.

    Stick to giving legal advice. I don’t think you have a clue about running a legal business.

  • Marie says:

    Kari is the only person I have spoken to who has agreed to look at my situation and advise first. Solicitors wanted from £600 upwards from me just to review and perhaps send a letter . This way I get to know if I should pursue the legal action or forget it. Great idea with a common sense approach to the law which I knew would exist somewhere . Thank you

  • Anonymous says:

    This service is no cheaper than approaching a solicitor. In addition, they do not do any paperwork for you, you need to do it yourself or pay them extra to do it.

    I simple don’t have £4-5k to pay for a barrister every time I have to go to Court.

    They are very attentive at first to get your money, and overcharge twice as much for everything.

    There is no compassion for someone like myself who just did not have the money to represent myself and was asking for some form of instalment plan, no help there! I was just advised to get a loan, which would have cost me over £11k for a £5k loan, putting me in even more debt.
    Basically it’s all about the money!
    I was charge £4,500 to submit an application to set aside a court order, the Court fee is £255, how can that be justified????


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

18 November 2019

Protecting data in the cloud – a guide for law firms

Despite all of its advantages by way of ease and efficiency in a digital world, storing data within the cloud does not come without risks. Firms have to ensure they are safeguarded from a potentially disastrous loss.

Read More

Loading animation