Overcharged by a solicitor? Go to a barrister instead, says new direct access service


The Bar: 89% of public unaware of direct access

Barristers’ bid to persuade consumers to come direct to them for legal advice has stepped up with a new direct access service claiming that more than half of Britons think solicitors overcharge.

Absolute Barrister is the brainchild of husband and wife pair Simon and Katy Gittins, both barristers of eight years’ call, and claims to be able to halve the cost of some legal matters.

Having finished a trial phase, Ms Gittins said “we know there is demand for it”, and the company is now rolling out a public relations and marketing campaign.

She said the idea came from a belief that the high solicitor model is failing because it is “outdated, unwieldy and expensive”.

The ‘Solicitor Satisfaction Barometer’ polled a sample of 1,535 people and found that 54% of Britons – and “a staggering 42% of those working in the legal industry” – think solicitors overcharge. A third have faced time delays in solicitors’ handling of their case, 30% don’t understand their pricing structures and just 8% believe solicitors act quickly in the service they provide.

A fifth felt intimidated by the process and uncomfortable asking about charges, with one in eight admitting that when they used a solicitor, they were unsure what the solicitor did for their fees.

Overall, the company said, “the barometer reveals a concern across the UK with the solicitor model of legal advice. Almost one in 10 (9%) people said they didn’t trust the solicitor like they expected to and felt they hid things from them, didn’t understand the advice they were given, or thought they were trying to confuse them with legal jargon.”

The vast majority, however, were unaware that they could go directly to a barrister. “It is astonishing that 89% of people are unaware that going straight to a barrister is even an option,” said Ms Gittins. “Absolute Barrister aims to debunk the myths surrounding barristers and to make the whole process completely transparent.”

Users of the service pay both the barrister’s fixed fee and an administration fee to Absolute Barristers; barristers do not have to pay the company “so as not to create the impression of conflicting loyalties”, Ms Gittins explained. There are currently around 40 barristers on the panel, which will grow in line with demand.

Using a divorce settlement with a contested financial element as an example, she said an Absolute Barrister client could expect to pay £7,200, whereas the average when using a solicitor is £13,300.

The case is mainly conducted through an online portal and instant messaging; though Absolute Barrister will handle some of the administrative work, users will be expected to have a role too. Ms Gittins said: “It’s been surprising how willing people are to do some of the steps themselves.”

“We provide direct access to the foremost legal experts – barristers. Our approach dramatically cuts the costs and time involved in legal proceedings for clients. Fees are agreed up front so our clients know exactly where they stand and there are never any nasty surprises. Gone are the days of worrying over the cost of receiving a letter, a telephone call or photocopies.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Michael says:

    “Using a divorce settlement with a contested financial element as an example, she said an Absolute Barrister client could expect to pay £7,200, whereas the average when using a solicitor is £13,300.”

    With the greatest of respect, this is complete cobblers. I don’t know where they got their figures from, but the average financial settlement for ordinary people out in the sticks costs not only less than the figure of £13,300 quoted but less than the £7,200 figure.

    And how many barristers would be willing to put up with the type of client that divorce lawyers have to deal with constantly, ringing several times a day,and turning up unannounced just to have a moan about the unfairness of life and the iniquity of the justice system.

    I think they will be in for a serious culture shock.

  • Hey, what a great, novel and innovative idea that has never, ever been tried before!

    Instead of focusing on delivering great value, service, advice and support, let’s compete on price. That seems to have worked really well for others.

    But wait, there’s more…I can deliver great value, service, advice and support for half the price.

    Stick to giving legal advice. I don’t think you have a clue about running a legal business.

  • Marie says:

    Kari is the only person I have spoken to who has agreed to look at my situation and advise first. Solicitors wanted from £600 upwards from me just to review and perhaps send a letter . This way I get to know if I should pursue the legal action or forget it. Great idea with a common sense approach to the law which I knew would exist somewhere . Thank you


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

14 November 2018

How accessible is your recruitment process?

Recognising the benefits of employing disabled people in the legal profession, and attracting talented disabled candidates is a great start, but of little use if your recruitment process is not inclusive nor accessible.

Read More