“Outrage” as only partners are allowed to work from home


Magennis: Health and safety issue

A union representing legal workers has expressed outrage at the “classist allocation of risk” that is seeing law firm partners work from home while other staff are forced into the office during the coronavirus pandemic.

The Legal Sector Workers Union (LSWU) – which represents qualified lawyers as well as a very wide range of other workers in the legal sector – also warned firms it would take action if staff were dismissed for leaving offices due to health concerns.

The union is part of United Voices of the World, which more broadly represents low-paid and predominantly migrant workers mainly in London’s outsourced industries.

It tweeted last night: “We have been forensically mapping law firms’ responses to COVID-19 across the legal sector. A shocking divide is evident: wealthy partners are working from home, while the lowest paid, most precarious staff are being forced to come into the office.

“This is an outrage. We are organising against this classist allocation of risk, which is an abuse of legal sector workers. If your bosses are sending you to work when you could be working from home, join LSWU without delay. We will support you immediately in making your demands.”

Earlier in the day it tweeted that one of its members, a trainee at a large legal aid firm, had walked out of a meeting that their employer was “trying to make them attend”. No sanction was imposed but the union said if members “reasonably decide to take your and other’s safety into your own hands, we’ll back you”.

Barrister Franck Magennis, currently seconded from Garden Court Chambers to United Voices of the World as its head of legal, added: “The pandemic is coming to a head in the legal sector. Managing partners at too many law firms are failing to act.

“As usual, it’s the most precarious workers who are leading the way. This is a health & safety issue. You have a right to walk off the job if conditions aren’t safe.”

In an open letter to employers in the legal sector, the LSWU demanded that all workers sent home, sick or not, must remain on full pay. “This includes any outsourced workers, as well as those on zero-hour contracts, including our cleaner and security colleagues.”

Further, all legal sector workers should be able and encouraged to work from home, it said.

It urged employers “to get ahead of the curve as this crisis unfolds”, adding: “We remind you that as per s.44(100)(1)(d) Employment Rights Act 1996, workers will be found to be automatically unfairly dismissed if the sole or principal reason for dismissal is because the worker left or proposed to leave work and refused to return because they felt being at work posed a serious and imminent danger to themselves which could not be reasonably averted.

“We will not hesitate to avail ourselves and our members of any and all legal remedies should they be subjected to any unlawful sanction in connection with their reasonable responses to the pandemic…

“By arriving at an agreed response, your business along with the legal sector as a whole will be in the best possible position to pressure the government in adopting a more comprehensive and responsible approach…

“We do not want to see our workplaces — your businesses — falter. Together we can overcome this emergency.”

For more coronavirus updates, see here.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Planning for retirement
8 July 2020

In 2006 I started thinking about retirement whilst founding a boutique practice specialising in partnership and employment law. Ten years later, a friend told me that I would never be able to retire.


Time for a new regulatory settlement
3 July 2020

The problem with reform based on a compromise with vested interests is that it ends up being more pig’s ear than silk purse and the Legal Services Act 2007 is no exception.


Loading animation