Ombudsman takes solicitors to court for failing to comply with orders

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

17 August 2011


Sampson: regrettable we had to take these steps

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has brought its first enforcement actions in the county court after two law firms failed to comply with its orders.

In the first case, LeO had told the solicitors to pay £2,650 compensation to their client for paying money to a third party without authorisation.

The firm finally agreed to pay the money after the action was launched, and on Monday a district judge at Birmingham County Court ordered the firm to pay LeO’s £1,215 costs.

In the second case, a different firm had mismanaged work for a property owner and LeO had ordered it to pay the client £5,704 in compensation.

When the firm failed to comply, LeO issued proceedings for the court’s permission to enforce the decision as if it were a court judgment.

The firm initially tried to argue that the decision was defective but agreed to settle late in the day after LeO produced “the relevant legal materials”. It also agreed to pay LeO’s costs of £1,000. The hearing was adjourned for 28 days for this to be done.

Adam Sampson, the Chief Legal Ombudsman, said: “These are the first such enforcement proceedings we’ve brought under the Legal Services Act 2007. It’s regrettable that we had to take these steps, and that the firms didn’t act more promptly to bring matters to a close for the complainants.

“The cases are a reminder that ombudsman decisions, once accepted by complainants, are binding. Lawyers need to remember that our decisions are enforceable through the courts and that failure to comply promptly can mean an unnecessary expense.

“Those who don’t comply are likely to have to pay costs ordered by the courts, and risk being referred by us on conduct grounds to their regulatory body.”

Earlier this year, LeO made under the Act by seeking a court order to force a solicitor to provide access to documents.

Tags: ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How to make a case to the unconverted

Jonathan Whittle

The prospect of change is a daunting one, whether you’re a global firm or a small one. You might think that your firm’s working practices are fine, or that there’s no value in altering the way you do things because of the disruption it would cause. You might even see the benefits of using a different methodology, but still refuse to put the effort in to implement it – and you wouldn’t be alone. From our research in the 2016 report, The Riddle of Perception, we know that 73% of lawyers believe that adapting to change is not where their strength lies. However, it’s no longer optional.

November 16th, 2017