Ombudsman prepares for ABSs after Parliament approves rule changes

Print This Post

14 January 2013


Co-op: legal services delivered through banks risks consumer confusion

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has won approval for changes to its rules that bring them more in line with the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and so equip it better to deal  with alternative business structures (ABS) like Co-operative Legal Services.

As first revealed on Legal Futures in November, LeO proposed a series of changes to its scheme rules, and these have now received parliamentary approval to take effect from 1 February.

They include allowing complaints from prospective clients, raising the compensation limit from £30,000 to £50,000 (FOS’s limit is £150,000), and increasing the time limits for accepting a complaint from a year to six years from the date of act/omission or three years from the date the complainant should reasonably have known there were grounds for complaint.

LeO has also decided to drop the two ‘free’ cases that lawyers are allowed each year without having to pay the case fee.

Chief Legal Ombudsman Adam Sampson said: “At the heart of what we are proposing is a desire to future proof against changes in both the legal market and our jurisdiction.”

He told Legal Futures that harmonisation with FOS’s rules was the key element of the thinking behind the reforms – the nature of some ABS applicants meant “there is a very strong crossover between the provision of legal services and of financial services”.

He pointed to Co-operative Legal Service offering legal advice through its bank branches. “There is an increased risk of consumer confusion under those circumstances and it makes sense to ensure as much as possible that our rules are in line with FOS’s.” However, he said that to date LeO has seen very few complaints about ABSs.

It is also intended that the changes will help prepare LeO to start handling complaints about claims management companies later this year.

LeO said it does not anticipate that the changes will add substantially to the 75,000-80,000 contacts it receives each year; however, it does expect around a 10% increase in the proportion of contacts which will fall within its eligibility criteria. This will inevitably increase the number of full investigations – currently around 7,000 – that the organisation carries out.

Mr Sampson added: “We consulted heavily with legal professionals, regulators and consumer groups before making the revisions. I’m confident that they will stand us in good stead to remain an effective complaint-handling body.”

Tags: , , , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

New right to paid leave for bereaved parents: A welcome move

Kimberley Manning DAS

This year, like many in recent years, has seen some key changes within the employment law field, with the government, trade unions and lobbyists remaining endlessly engaged in seeking to impose their interpretation of fair balance between employers and their respective workforces. Although consensus on that equilibrium can never really be achieved, sometimes there are pieces of legislative movement which are difficult to argue with regardless of your perspective: This is one of those. Published on 13 October 2017, the Parental Bereavement (Pay and Leave) Bill would provide for the first time a legal right to parents who are employed and have suffered the death of a child, a minimum of two weeks’ leave in which to grieve.

November 20th, 2017