Now MoJ sits on litigants in person report for over a year


Ministry of Justice

MoJ: Report awaiting “quality assurance”

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has failed to publish for over a year a major report on litigants in person in family law cases involving six universities, it has emerged.

Dame Ursula Brennan, permanent secretary at the MoJ, was strongly criticised by MPs on the justice select committee last month for publishing a highly critical report on the criminal legal aid cuts a year after it was finished.

The research on litigants in person, led by Professor Liz Trinder at Exeter University, aimed to assess the impact of the legal aid cuts in private family law cases. The universities of Bristol, Kent, Cambridge, Cardiff and UCL in London were also involved.

According to the Exeter University’s website, the work was commissioned by the MoJ in November 2012 and designed to help people understand the “range or types” of litigants in person and their “behaviourial drivers and support needs”.

The study also examined the impact of unrepresented litigants on the court system before the legal aid reforms, “to aid in mitigating some of the issues that might arise post-reform and assessing the impacts of reform”.

Fieldwork for the project was carried out in early 2013 and included observations of 151 hearings, case file analysis, and interviews and focus groups with litigants and lawyers. An overview report and thematic report containing the main findings were handed to the MoJ in September 2013.

A spokesman for the MoJ said Professor Trinder’s report was “awaiting quality assurance” and there was no date set for its publication.

Simon Hughes, the justice minister, acknowledged the growth in litigants in person in the civil and family courts by unveiling a £2m package of support last month.

Aimed at keeping disputes away from court as supporting individuals with their litigation, the funding will enable, along with other things, expansion of the Personal Support Unit.

Tags:




Blog


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


Loading animation