Norfolk councils plan ABS to increase revenue and client base


Norfolk County Council HQ: ABS to be set up as subsidiary

Norfolk County Council HQ: ABS to be set up as subsidiary

A shared legal services between four local authorities in Norfolk is set to create an alternative business structure (ABS).

Norfolk Public Law – which trades as nplaw – is choosing to add the ABS alongside its existing practice, rather than transfer everything into the new company, as some other local authority legal teams have done.

According to a report to Norfolk County Council’s policy and resources committee, this is because any net profits generated by the ABS would be subject to corporation tax at 20%, so placing all trading activity within it “may not make commercial sense”.

Initial forecasting was that the ABS would generate additional “surplus” of £50,000 in 2017/18 to £300,000 in 2019/20 respectively.

Nplaw launched six years ago through the merger of the legal teams at Norfolk County Council, Norwich City Council and Great Yarmouth Borough Council, with South Norfolk District Council’s legal team joining in 2012.

It also provides a partial legal service to the Broads Authority and three further Norfolk district councils: Breckland, Broadland, and Kings Lynn and West Norfolk.

With over 70 fee-earners, nplaw covers five areas: child protection; dispute resolution; planning and the environment; property; and public law and standards.

The report said the ABS, which will be owned by the county council, would allow nplaw “to increase its client base and realise a greater share of its income from external clients” by allowing it to trade more widely than current Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) rules permit local government lawyers to do in a traditional structure.

“Nplaw will continue to pursue as much business as possible trading as nplaw within the current structure and regulations. The company [the ABS] will only trade in circumstances where nplaw cannot undertake the work directly.

“To satisfy SRA requirements and ensure that the activities of the company are maintained entirely separately from the nplaw in-house service, the new company will be branded independently from the in-house service.” It has been reported that this will be Anglia Law.

It said the SRA has also cautioned that the ABS “must be very aware of situations where a conflict of interest might arise”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

20 September 2018
Simon McCrum

Why don’t lawyers do what you ask them to do?

Having been team leader, department head, division head and managing partner, I understand well the frustration (and anger) that managing partners and CEOs voice to me: “We’ve asked them a dozen times, but still they aren’t doing what we need!”

Read More