“No excuse” for barrister’s positive discrimination jibe at judge

Becker: Admitted charge on day of tribunal

There can be “no excuse” for a barrister suggesting that a female Asian judge only secured her position as a result of positive discrimination, a Bar disciplinary tribunal has ruled.

The remarks were “wholly contrary to the Bar’s commitment to equality and diversity”, it said.

We reported last month that Timothy Becker was reprimanded and fined £750 for making the comment in an email to the claimant in a civil case in which he was acting for the defendant on a public access basis.

Mr Becker insisted that he was only referring to what he thought was the deputy district judge’s qualification as a solicitor.

The tribunal’s ruling has now been published and showed that, up until the morning of the hearing, the barrister did not think his words could be construed as racist or sexist.

It said: “Up until then he had, to use of words of [his counsel Marc Beaumont] in mitigation, ‘been making excuses’.”

The tribunal continued: “There can be no excuse for a member of the Bar to make such a statement, still less to make it in the course of litigation.

“The remarks were rude and wholly contrary to the Bar’s commitment to equality and diversity.”

The fact that Mr Becker had conceded that “a reasonable reader would have understood his remarks… as a reference to her sex and/or race”, and admitted he had diminished trust in the profession, meant the tribunal did not have to decide “what meaning Mr Becker actually intended to convey”.

In mitigation, the tribunal took into account that it was an isolated incident and the barrister had a clean disciplinary record. “We also take into account his testimonials and that finally today he has admitted the charge.”

Mr Becker – who chairs the Public Access Bar Association – is head of Burlington Chambers in Piccadilly, central London, which he set up at the start of this year, and was called in 1992.

In his statement after the initial announcement of the sanction, he said he was “rightly reprimanded”.

He pointed to his “long-standing commitment to equality and diversity at the Bar” and pointed out that he was not accused of unlawful race or sex discrimination.

    Readers Comments

  • Esther Mensah says:

    This is the true nature of affairs, as I observed often occurs, without real understanding of the meaning & effect on the subject. People should be careful what to say before they open their mouths.

  • Kamlesh Parmar says:

    Is the Bar really committed to equality ? It decided that it was fine that barristers don’t help deaf litigants by making their judgment notes available.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Keeping the conversation going beyond Pride Month

As I reflect on all the celebrations of Pride Month 2024, I ask myself why there remains hesitancy amongst LGBTQ+ staff members about when it comes to being open about their identity in the workplace.

Third-party managed accounts: Your key questions answered

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has given strong indications that it is headed towards greater restrictions on law firms when it comes to handling client money.

Understanding vicarious trauma in the legal workplace

Vicarious trauma can happen to anyone who works with clients who have experienced trauma such as domestic or other violence, child abuse, sexual assault, torture or being a refugee.

Loading animation