New Bar leader: young barristers should take place of paid McKenzie Friends

Print This Post

10 December 2014

Alistair MacDonald

MacDonald: rise of the McKenzie Friend “of great concern”

Junior barristers should get themselves accredited for direct access work and act in cases where people are currently relying on paid McKenzie Friends, the incoming Bar Council chairman has said as he promised to promote direct access to the public.

“The rise of the McKenzie friend beyond any function they were supposed to meet, is of great concern,” Alistair MacDonald QC said.

“The position is that, in certain circumstances, the fees of a McKenzie friend, who has been permitted by the court to represent a party, are recoverable from the other side in the litigation. This is a very worrying situation.”

Mr MacDonald said paid McKenzie Friends were not regulated and “many, if not most” were uninsured.

“There is a website setting out the details of their fees. They range, as a stated maximum from £25 an hour in Cornwall to £100 in London with the majority at about £50 to £60 per hour.

“I believe that many of the litigants currently paying McKenzie friends would prefer to employ the services of a fully insured and regulated junior barrister, who has carried out pupillage and has the benefit of operating from chambers if they did but know that they had that option.”

Giving his inaugural speech as incoming chairman of the Bar Council, Mr MacDonald called on “barristers, particularly at the junior end of the profession” to become qualified to accept instructions directly.

“What I undertake is that, in 2015, we will act with vigour and energy to make it clear to the general public that the Bar can be instructed directly and to seek to do everything in our power to promote the instruction of barristers qualified to receive such instructions. By doing that, I am sure we can make a substantial difference”.

Mr MacDonald said he did not believe in many cases that the Bar would be taking work from solicitors, and that “a substantial part of this work” would come from clients who would have used McKenzie Friends.

He said there was also the “ability of the Bar to assist with only parts of the case” – a reference to unbundling.

The QC went on: “In other words, to give advice only to the litigant with a view to helping them to concentrate on the points that really matter.

“Or it may be that the barrister can be instructed only to prepare the bundles for trial, or appear without having performed the earlier work. After all, that is not dissimilar is it to what we have done for centuries.

“All I am saying is that we must not be hidebound by old-fashioned restrictions. We must live in the world as it is.”

Mr MacDonald concluded: “The first mention of a barrister as such was in 1466. It is idle to suppose that the Bar would have survived and flourished since that date unless it had something unique to offer, something that no-one else could provide and unless, one way or another, it provided value for money to those who had need of the services of a barrister.

“I am confident that the intellectual resilience, the sheer ability to think our way through changes in the way legal services are offered, which assisted our predecessors as they charted their way through centuries of social and political reform, will stand us in good stead as we move through another period of substantial change.”

Mr MacDonald, who takes up his post on 1 January 2015 is co-head of New Park Chambers in Leeds, and a former leader of the North-Eastern Circuit.


Tags: , , ,

One Response to “New Bar leader: young barristers should take place of paid McKenzie Friends”

  1. I’m inclined to recall the names Nicholas Mostyn gave to his piglets.

  2. Nick Langford on December 10th, 2014 at 1:59 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018