Minister tells profession to adapt to “the new circumstances” of life in the law

McNally: productive dialogue needed

Solicitors and barristers will have to adjust to “the new circumstances” they are facing as a result of legal aid and other reforms “if they are going to survive”, justice minister Lord McNally said yesterday.

Responding in the House of Lords to a question on legal aid from Bar Standards Board chair Baroness Deech, and follow-ups from other peers, Lord McNally said “we have heard various parts of the legal profession harping on about the worst-case scenario, which we simply do not accept”.

He continued: “We are in consultation and have put forward proposals about legal aid contracts. However, the legal professions are facing a number of changes, irrespective of what we are proposing on legal aid… and they will have to adjust to the new circumstances if they are going to survive.

“We are consulting with the Law Society and Bar Council, and with other bodies and individuals. We are listening and we hope to get a solution that will reflect what the government can afford to pay on legal aid at the moment but that will also leave us with the protections for our legal aid system that many of us have taken pride in.”

Lord McNally dismissed calls to slow down the introduction of price competitive tendering: “It is about 10 years since the Carter report had a look at this matter. It is more than three years since the previous Labour government made cuts to criminal legal aid. The Labour Party, in its 2010 manifesto, was the only party to say that it would look for further cuts in legal aid.

“In that time there have been changes – alternative business structures and other changes – to the legal profession, yet we are still told that this has come as a surprise. Instead of asking for more time and putting forward arguments that are mainly scare stories, it would be good if the legal profession responded to this consultation with a productive dialogue that could put legal aid on a sustainable and lasting footing.”

He suggested that “barristers and solicitors start thinking about how best to organise themselves to function in circumstances in which money may be a little tighter than it once was. These are circumstances that many other professions and many other areas of our society have to face”.


    Readers Comments

  • Christopher Amis says:

    It is hard for the CBA to enter into a dialogue with the Justice Minister Christopher Grayling when he refuses even to speak to the leader of the Criminal Bar Association, Michael Turner QQ and then ducks out of a radio debate on learning that Turner is a guest because he knows he’ll be taken to pieces by Mr Turner.

    Please don’t mislead the public with the crass observation that legal aid lawyers will have to adapt as if they havent been having to do that for the last 15 years. The result of reducing legal aid fee payments by 40% over the last 15 years has meant that solicitors and barristers have had constantly to cut overheads and maximise profit to survive. But we have reached the irreducible minimum now.

    And please don’t pretend that Lord Carter ever envisaged or supported introducing the sort of changes to the provision of legal aid you espouse. He underlined the essential importance of the accused man being able to choose his own solicitor and the need to preserve quality at the heart of the system, two things which will be stripped away under your proposals.

    Your comments are utterly disingenuous and merely reflect the deeply held prejudice you entertain towards the legal profession.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Retrospective or not retrospective, that is the question

As the debate heats up over the Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, it is crucial to understand what is the true vice in retrospective legislation.

Harnessing the balance of technology and human interaction

In today’s legal landscape, finding the delicate balance between driving efficiency via use of technology and providing a personalised service is paramount to success.

AI’s legal leap: transforming law practice with intelligent tech

Just like in numerous other industries, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector is proving to be a game-changer.

Loading animation